Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 07, 2024, 07:04:31 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: 4-4 f@ck!ng 2  (Read 1028 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

andyst79

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1479
4-4 f@ck!ng 2
« on August 21, 2011, 07:53:08 pm by andyst79 »
The carling cup tie on Tuesday could be an ideal opportunity to try a more rigid formation, we have nothing to lose. 2011 has not been a good year due to injuries and a shocking run of games. Sacking the manager is not the answer, I believe he can take us forward but surely he  must realise he needs to rethink his tactics. He's got a great eye 4 a player and even the fit players we have are more than capable of playing a more direct style of play. I don't mean the long ball , I mean fast slick forward passing , breaking in numbers and working the flanks . It's gotta be worth a try?!



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

Rovin Reporter

  • Newbie
Re: 4-4 f@ck!ng 2
« Reply #1 on August 21, 2011, 09:13:31 pm by Rovin Reporter »
Quote from: \"andyst79\" post=178058
The carling cup tie on Tuesday could be an ideal opportunity to try a more rigid formation, we have nothing to lose. 2011 has not been a good year due to injuries and a shocking run of games. Sacking the manager is not the answer, I believe he can take us forward but surely he  must realise he needs to rethink his tactics. He's got a great eye 4 a player and even the fit players we have are more than capable of playing a more direct style of play. I don't mean the long ball , I mean fast slick forward passing , breaking in numbers and working the flanks . It's gotta be worth a try?!
TEll SO'D NOT US!!!

Dare2Dream

  • Newbie
Re: 4-4 f@ck!ng 2
« Reply #2 on August 22, 2011, 12:15:29 pm by Dare2Dream »
Milan Lalkovic can't play Tuesday cos he's cup-tied, so there's only Chris Brown fit to play up front. So we can't play 4-4-2, cos we've not got two strikers? & There's little point playing someone out of position when we can get much more benefits from them playing in their regular role? And we haven't got a regular left winger anyway unless Copps plays there, due to Woods being out?

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012