0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
QuoteWhat I did believe is that if/when we went down that we had a manager who would stabilise the club and within a season or two put us in the position to have another go at the Championship. Now, I fear we will go into freefall if we do go down.I agree.
What I did believe is that if/when we went down that we had a manager who would stabilise the club and within a season or two put us in the position to have another go at the Championship. Now, I fear we will go into freefall if we do go down.
Quote from: \"Wellred\" post=214824yawnnnnnnnnnnnIf you're tired go to bed. Old gits like you need their sleep.
yawnnnnnnnnnnn
Quote from: \"Sheepskin Stu\" post=214825Quote from: \"Wellred\" post=214824yawnnnnnnnnnnnIf you're tired go to bed. Old gits like you need their sleep. You not supporting Forest yet?
Secondly. Can i ask Madmick a question.What were the Board at DRFC supposed to do. After 7 games we had a great points total, add that to the Dismal run at end of last season, and knowing SOD ALWAYS has 2 bad spells a season, some fairly short. some protracted. He had a very average win % during his tenure , something just over 1/3, so to coin one of your favourite subjects his Statistics mean DRFC would win about 13 of the remaining games, thats 39 points, add to what DRFC had that = RELEGATION.So, the board stood to lose 4 million from TV rights, then had a choice of whether to keep current players ( who would by then have proved in effective ), or release / pay off most of them, then have to spend a million or two recruiting what SOD wanted all over again, with little guarentee of success. Thats around 10 million the club would lose.What did you expect the board to do.To me they acted correctly. At leastr we have a fighting chance now, with SOD we had not.
QuoteSecondly. Can i ask Madmick a question.What were the Board at DRFC supposed to do. After 7 games we had a great points total, add that to the Dismal run at end of last season, and knowing SOD ALWAYS has 2 bad spells a season, some fairly short. some protracted. He had a very average win % during his tenure , something just over 1/3, so to coin one of your favourite subjects his Statistics mean DRFC would win about 13 of the remaining games, thats 39 points, add to what DRFC had that = RELEGATION.So, the board stood to lose 4 million from TV rights, then had a choice of whether to keep current players ( who would by then have proved in effective ), or release / pay off most of them, then have to spend a million or two recruiting what SOD wanted all over again, with little guarentee of success. Thats around 10 million the club would lose.What did you expect the board to do.To me they acted correctly. At leastr we have a fighting chance now, with SOD we had not.What the board should have done is to back SO'D 100% and not stab him in the back. They should have kept a cool head and not panicked. They should have waited for our injury crisis to abate so SO'D had a fair chance of keeping us up. They should have remembered that he had got us out of a situation like this before. They should have realised that had we gone down SO'D would have re-built the side and given us a good chance of getting back into the Championship once again, hopefully fairly quickly.What they should not have done is gamble the future of the club on a long shot. What they have done is the equivalent to betting the house on a 100/1 outsider in the Grand National. At the very least they should have swapped SO'D with a manager with Championship experience. Not someone who took years to get probably the biggest club in the Conference into a promotion position. I fully expect us to go into free fall once we get relegated. It didn't need to be that way. I pray it doesn't happen but ever since Saunders came on board with the McKay strategy the writing was on the wall. All you rose tinted glasses merchants will no doubt be outraged by what I am saying but I prefer to be a realist not a fantasist.
What the board should have done is to back SO'D 100% and not stab him in the back. They should have kept a cool head and not panicked. They should have waited for our injury crisis to abate so SO'D had a fair chance of keeping us up. They should have remembered that he had got us out of a situation like this before. They should have realised that had we gone down SO'D would have re-built the side and given us a good chance of getting back into the Championship once again, hopefully fairly quickly.
What they should not have done is gamble the future of the club on a long shot. What they have done is the equivalent to betting the house on a 100/1 outsider in the Grand National. At the very least they should have swapped SO'D with a Conference manager with Championship experience. Not someone who took years to get probably the biggest club in the into a promotion position.
I fully expect us to go into free fall once we get relegated. It didn't need to be that way. I pray it doesn't happen but ever since Saunders came on board with the McKay strategy the writing was on the wall. All you rose tinted glasses merchants will no doubt be outraged by what I am saying but I prefer to be a realist not a fantasist.
QuoteSecondly. Can i ask Madmick a question.What were the Board at DRFC supposed to do. After 7 games we had a great points total, add that to the Dismal run at end of last season, and knowing SOD ALWAYS has 2 bad spells a season, some fairly short. some protracted. He had a very average win % during his tenure , something just over 1/3, so to coin one of your favourite subjects his Statistics mean DRFC would win about 13 of the remaining games, thats 39 points, add to what DRFC had that = RELEGATION.So, the board stood to lose 4 million from TV rights, then had a choice of whether to keep current players ( who would by then have proved in effective ), or release / pay off most of them, then have to spend a million or two recruiting what SOD wanted all over again, with little guarentee of success. Thats around 10 million the club would lose.What did you expect the board to do.To me they acted correctly. At leastr we have a fighting chance now, with SOD we had not.What the board should have done is to back SO'D 100% and not stab him in the back. They should have kept a cool head and not panicked. They should have waited for our injury crisis to abate so SO'D had a fair chance of keeping us up. They should have remembered that he had got us out of a situation like this before. They should have realised that had we gone down SO'D would have re-built the side and given us a good chance of getting back into the Championship once again, hopefully fairly quickly.What the Board should have done is got rid of SOD a lot sooner than they did, he had ample time to turn things round. The board did not panic, SOD did. Why did he tell the board the best they could hope for was relegation and maybe rebuild for an assault on the championship in the future. Why should the board back hm on a \"maybe\".What they should not have done is gamble the future of the club on a long shot. What they have done is the equivalent to betting the house on a 100/1 outsider in the Grand National. At the very least they should have swapped SO'D with a manager with Championship experience. Not someone who took years to get probably the biggest club in the Conference into a promotion position.Did it not take Dave Penney an equally long time to get DRFC out of the conference, was he that bad a manager. Managers have to start somewhere. People in the know rate Saunders, older and wiser folk than you or i tip him to be a great manager. I fully expect us to go into free fall once we get relegated. It didn't need to be that way. I pray it doesn't happen but ever since Saunders came on board with the McKay strategy the writing was on the wall. All you rose tinted glasses merchants will no doubt be outraged by what I am saying but I prefer to be a realist not a fantasist.