Squad Turnover..

[GazLaz]

Is this amount of turnover every season sustainable?

[Chris Black come back]

Most of the teams at the top end are no hopers. Most of the teams at the bottom will be in or around play offs (Bolton aside).

We have had three managers in less than 18 months. All would want to reshape their squads.

[sedwardsdrfc]

Lincoln, Fleetwood, Blackpool, Pompey & Peterborough aren't exactly no hopers. Understand we've had manager changes but the answer to the question is no its not. Most of the teams at the bottom have either been relegated or have financial difficulties, not sure we want to be mixing with them. Next season the turnover will be even greater can't see any of the 6 loan players staying and then some will leave and god forbid copps may retire 

[Chris Black come back]

Of the top 7 only 2 have credible claims for promotion. Rest will be nowhere - and have you seen how Southend United are doing?

Of the bottom rung on there everyone can expect to be in mix for promotion and if Bolton were without the penalty they might have a shot.

Not saying the turnover is desirable, but there is no direct link there clearly.

[dickos1]

Of the top 7 only 2 have credible claims for promotion. Rest will be nowhere - and have you seen how Southend United are doing?

Of the bottom rung on there everyone can expect to be in mix for promotion and if Bolton were without the penalty they might have a shot.

Not saying the turnover is desirable, but there is no direct link there clearly.

I know you often like manipulating stuff to back your point but that’s nonsense.
Lincoln, fleetwood, Blackpool, Portsmouth, will all be comfortably above, Bristol rovers, Wimbledon, Shrewsbury.

[DonnyOsmond]

The average places of the top 7 will be higher than the average of those bottom 7 in that list.

[dickos1]

The average places of the top 7 will be higher than the average of those bottom 7 in that list.

Exactly

[Chris Black come back]

Of the top 7 only 2 have credible claims for promotion. Rest will be nowhere - and have you seen how Southend United are doing?

Of the bottom rung on there everyone can expect to be in mix for promotion and if Bolton were without the penalty they might have a shot.

Not saying the turnover is desirable, but there is no direct link there clearly.

I know you often like manipulating stuff to back your point but that’s nonsense.
Lincoln, fleetwood, Blackpool, Portsmouth, will all be comfortably above, Bristol rovers, Wimbledon, Shrewsbury.

Of the top 7 only 2 have credible claims for promotion. Rest will be nowhere - and have you seen how Southend United are doing?

Of the bottom rung on there everyone can expect to be in mix for promotion and if Bolton were without the penalty they might have a shot.

Not saying the turnover is desirable, but there is no direct link there clearly.

I know you often like manipulating stuff to back your point but that’s nonsense.
Lincoln, fleetwood, Blackpool, Portsmouth, will all be comfortably above, Bristol rovers, Wimbledon, Shrewsbury.

I will make the point again - the bottom row of teams there with the highest turnover will - the special case of Bolton aside - be challenging for the play offs this season. I don’t think anyone will find that controversial or anything to pick a fight over.

I don’t think there is a massive correlation here, but agree having less turnover rather than more is desirable, but with three managers in less than 18 months it is inevitable.

You obviously haven’t benefitted from a good night of sleep and are perhaps still upset from your disappointment yesterday. Try and look on the positive side, maybe take the dog for a walk, or do some odd jobs. Get some wider perspective rather than being so angry - we are actually doing well this season!

[dickos1]

That’s your opinion

In my opinion the sides on the top row will all be up there maybe barring Wycombe but even they made a couple of very good signings and are so far unbeaten this season

[Chris Black come back]

That’s your opinion

In my opinion the sides on the top row will all be up there maybe barring Wycombe but even they made a couple of very good signings and are so far unbeaten this season

True - Wycombe are doing well, but four games is of course far too early to be making any assumptions or predictions....maybe look after ten games, for instance...

[dickos1]

Exactly which is why I said barring Wycombe.

[Chris Black come back]

Why bother citing their form after four games then, unless it was to justify them doing well? - even though form after four games is of course, not relevant.

[NickDRFC]

Why bother citing their form after four games then, unless it was to justify them doing well? - even though form after four games is of course, not relevant.

Haven't you been continually saying how no one should be complaining about our transfer business are as we've scored in every game and we're unbeaten? How can you say that if form after four games is not relevant?

[Chris Black come back]

Whoosh......