0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Cricket is done on the big screen, so it would be quicker to do that than the ref run across the pitch to see a little laptop, as in cricket if it is to close to call then he can't make a decision isand game carries on
Sorry but I disagree..Football is too unpredictable - you can have a great game of football at the highest level which would be very attractive to advertisers but which has absolutely no incidents where VAR is used.Games like American football, cricket, and rugby have many more stoppages so there are greater opportunities for video officiating.Not everything in football is a conspiracy you know .
You're in the minority or lying if you said you never wanted it. The amount of terrible decisions over the years and everyone saying technology is needed to solve this. France Ireland world cup qualifier, England v Germany in SA to name huge ones but there's hundreds of smaller examples.VAR as a concept is brilliant and is the future but it's being applied awfully, either through terrible rules or these ridiculous offside lines with his left knacker playing him onside etc. If you're wanting rid then you're wanting to go back to the dark ages of refs making awful decisions. All that's happened is the chants have changed from "the refs a..." to "VARs a...", why would you want to go back? VAR just needs to be improved, not gotten rid of.
I’d be more than happy to just keep the goal line technology and leave it at that . There’s no fall out from that kind of technology and it’s cut and dried . Scrap the rest