Socialism

[SydneyRover]

bb would understand after all he's the man of mirth, everything's funny.

[drfchound]

What strange and bizarre reply.

[SydneyRover]

fourth can?

[selby]

  I see you were not against using the same tax avoidance rules as those " Tory arse lickers" you describe on another thread to benefit financially Filo, I don't blame you rules are rules but  as I say good socialists and other peoples money for parents care fees, lots of good socialists are into that with you.

[Filo]

  I see you were not against using the same tax avoidance rules as those " Tory arse lickers" you describe on another thread to benefit financially Filo, I don't blame you rules are rules but  as I say good socialists and other peoples money for parents care fees, lots of good socialists are into that with you.

Not sure what tax I’ve avoided, if you mean the care home costs, (which I didn’t avoid because my mother never went into a care home), it was n’t me who put those provisions in place, it was my late Mother

[big fat yorkshire pudding]

  I see you were not against using the same tax avoidance rules as those " Tory arse lickers" you describe on another thread to benefit financially Filo, I don't blame you rules are rules but  as I say good socialists and other peoples money for parents care fees, lots of good socialists are into that with you.

Not sure what tax I’ve avoided, if you mean the care home costs, (which I didn’t avoid because my mother never went into a care home), it was n’t me who put those provisions in place, it was my late Mother

Would you do it?

The point whilst unfairly aimed at you is fair in terms of socialists, they often are happy to complain on things but also happy to benefit where it suits them, it's hypocritical.

There's some points on housing, why should youngsters rent? Rental costs are extortionate and horrendous value for money.  Where I live 2 bed small houses are going for £675 a month and snapped up in days. You'd get a better house than that on a mortgage.

It was said people will benefit from inheritance.  I'm 34 and thankfully still have 3 living grandparents let alone parents, it's a financial gap for many young people now, which is a great thing but where do they find a deposit?

But on socialism is there a place for it? Absolutely. It doesn't work on its own a balance between socialism and capitalism is sensible.

[wilts rover]

It will be fascinating to see what the response is from people who are against socialism to the next thread we have on the redisbution of wealth from the rich clubs in Premier League down through the less well off in Football League.  Clearly they will be against it and the PL clubs keeping all their £billions in tv money.

[Bentley Bullet]

While we're comparing politics to football, It would also be fascinating to see why those who are against austerity politically, support a policy of austerity adopted by the Rovers owners.

[SydneyRover]

While we're comparing politics to football, It would also be fascinating to see why those who are against austerity politically, support a policy of austerity adopted by the Rovers owners.

Name and shame them bb as you seem to be in the know.

[Bentley Bullet]

It will be fascinating to see what the response is from people who are against socialism to the next thread we have on the redisbution of wealth from the rich clubs in Premier League down through the less well off in Football League.  Clearly they will be against it and the PL clubs keeping all their £billions in tv money.

Surely the less well off in the football league should be self-sustaining, and cut their cloth accordingly, like Rovers do?

[SydneyRover]

It will be fascinating to see what the response is from people who are against socialism to the next thread we have on the redisbution of wealth from the rich clubs in Premier League down through the less well off in Football League.  Clearly they will be against it and the PL clubs keeping all their £billions in tv money.

Surely the less well off in the football league should be self-sustaining, and cut their cloth accordingly, like Rovers do?

but if there's more cloth everyone gets to wear baggy pants

[Filo]

  I see you were not against using the same tax avoidance rules as those " Tory arse lickers" you describe on another thread to benefit financially Filo, I don't blame you rules are rules but  as I say good socialists and other peoples money for parents care fees, lots of good socialists are into that with you.

Not sure what tax I’ve avoided, if you mean the care home costs, (which I didn’t avoid because my mother never went into a care home), it was n’t me who put those provisions in place, it was my late Mother

Would you do it?

The point whilst unfairly aimed at you is fair in terms of socialists, they often are happy to complain on things but also happy to benefit where it suits them, it's hypocritical.

There's some points on housing, why should youngsters rent? Rental costs are extortionate and horrendous value for money.  Where I live 2 bed small houses are going for £675 a month and snapped up in days. You'd get a better house than that on a mortgage.

It was said people will benefit from inheritance.  I'm 34 and thankfully still have 3 living grandparents let alone parents, it's a financial gap for many young people now, which is a great thing but where do they find a deposit?

But on socialism is there a place for it? Absolutely. It doesn't work on its own a balance between socialism and capitalism is sensible.

Well I own my house and have n’t done it

[drfchound]

fourth can?

I don’t drink any cans of anything.
I might have four bottles of beer at home in a year.
Funny how you change a subject when it has been pointed out that you have misread a post.

[SydneyRover]

fourth can?

I don’t drink any cans of anything.
I might have four bottles of beer at home in a year.
Funny how you change a subject when it has been pointed out that you have misread a post.

And, what's your point?

[drfchound]

fourth can?

I don’t drink any cans of anything.
I might have four bottles of beer at home in a year.
Funny how you change a subject when it has been pointed out that you have misread a post.

And, what's your point?

I just told you.

[SydneyRover]

big whoop hound, the moderators could still be open

[drfchound]

big whoop hound, the moderators could still be open

You are really odd, bye.

[big fat yorkshire pudding]

  I see you were not against using the same tax avoidance rules as those " Tory arse lickers" you describe on another thread to benefit financially Filo, I don't blame you rules are rules but  as I say good socialists and other peoples money for parents care fees, lots of good socialists are into that with you.

Not sure what tax I’ve avoided, if you mean the care home costs, (which I didn’t avoid because my mother never went into a care home), it was n’t me who put those provisions in place, it was my late Mother

Would you do it?

The point whilst unfairly aimed at you is fair in terms of socialists, they often are happy to complain on things but also happy to benefit where it suits them, it's hypocritical.

There's some points on housing, why should youngsters rent? Rental costs are extortionate and horrendous value for money.  Where I live 2 bed small houses are going for £675 a month and snapped up in days. You'd get a better house than that on a mortgage.

It was said people will benefit from inheritance.  I'm 34 and thankfully still have 3 living grandparents let alone parents, it's a financial gap for many young people now, which is a great thing but where do they find a deposit?

But on socialism is there a place for it? Absolutely. It doesn't work on its own a balance between socialism and capitalism is sensible.

Well I own my house and have n’t done it

You should though, I don't feel it's right to have to sell houses to pay for care.

[SydneyRover]

big whoop hound, the moderators could still be open

You are really odd, bye.

You see hound that's why you're a bit of a plonker, look at the comment bb made to which I replied and then ask yourself if bb was being genuine? there's a fairly interesting debate going and bb wants to spoil it, you two are reasonably similar wouldn't you say?

[SydneyRover]

  I see you were not against using the same tax avoidance rules as those " Tory arse lickers" you describe on another thread to benefit financially Filo, I don't blame you rules are rules but  as I say good socialists and other peoples money for parents care fees, lots of good socialists are into that with you.

Not sure what tax I’ve avoided, if you mean the care home costs, (which I didn’t avoid because my mother never went into a care home), it was n’t me who put those provisions in place, it was my late Mother

Would you do it?

The point whilst unfairly aimed at you is fair in terms of socialists, they often are happy to complain on things but also happy to benefit where it suits them, it's hypocritical.

There's some points on housing, why should youngsters rent? Rental costs are extortionate and horrendous value for money.  Where I live 2 bed small houses are going for £675 a month and snapped up in days. You'd get a better house than that on a mortgage.

It was said people will benefit from inheritance.  I'm 34 and thankfully still have 3 living grandparents let alone parents, it's a financial gap for many young people now, which is a great thing but where do they find a deposit?

But on socialism is there a place for it? Absolutely. It doesn't work on its own a balance between socialism and capitalism is sensible.

Well I own my house and have n’t done it

You should though, I don't feel it's right to have to sell houses to pay for care.

Are you suggesting the state pays for care, that's a socialist but a good idea, but then people would have to pay more tax, everyone that is and one party would like not to have to pay any it would appear.

[Sprotyrover]

  I see you were not against using the same tax avoidance rules as those " Tory arse lickers" you describe on another thread to benefit financially Filo, I don't blame you rules are rules but  as I say good socialists and other peoples money for parents care fees, lots of good socialists are into that with you.

Not sure what tax I’ve avoided, if you mean the care home costs, (which I didn’t avoid because my mother never went into a care home), it was n’t me who put those provisions in place, it was my late Mother

Would you do it?

The point whilst unfairly aimed at you is fair in terms of socialists, they often are happy to complain on things but also happy to benefit where it suits them, it's hypocritical.

There's some points on housing, why should youngsters rent? Rental costs are extortionate and horrendous value for money.  Where I live 2 bed small houses are going for £675 a month and snapped up in days. You'd get a better house than that on a mortgage.

It was said people will benefit from inheritance.  I'm 34 and thankfully still have 3 living grandparents let alone parents, it's a financial gap for many young people now, which is a great thing but where do they find a deposit?

But on socialism is there a place for it? Absolutely. It doesn't work on its own a balance between socialism and capitalism is sensible.

Well I own my house and have n’t done it

You should though, I don't feel it's right to have to sell houses to pay for care.

Are you suggesting the state pays for care, that's a socialist but a good idea, but then people would have to pay more tax, everyone that is and one party would like not to have to pay any it would appear.

You on Can number 9 now Sydders?