Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 02, 2024, 08:16:18 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: Gary Woods  (Read 9081 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

donnievic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3632
Re: Gary Woods
« Reply #60 on March 18, 2013, 09:15:37 pm by donnievic »
And you also forgot

Husband-apart from scoring a few goals no end product
Wilson-not even good enough for gainsbrough
Pitch-not green enough
Roof-not see through
Goal music-it's back
Tannoy man-annoying


No wonder we are bottom of the league



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

BobG

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 9867
Re: Gary Woods
« Reply #61 on March 18, 2013, 09:21:46 pm by BobG »
Very good points Vic. We shouldn't forget the rests of the 'match day experience' either should we?

Cussy: we all owe you heartfelt thanks. I know I for one just hadn't realised how many players there at this club is who just aren't up to it. Vic: likewise for the poor quality of the rest of the experience. Thanks.

Christ. Do I hate everything that effing word 'experience' stands for!

BobG

woodyrovers

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 24
Re: Gary Woods
« Reply #62 on March 18, 2013, 09:38:25 pm by woodyrovers »
It was a difficult decision for the manager. There were a number of supporters, like me, who at this stage of the season would have welcomed the reassurance of seeing Sully playing especially after last week but Woods is the future and based on his performances this year deserves his position. I agree with many of the points made about the quality of the back passes and I would add to that, the fact that he was asked to play so many balls because for some reason our back line was really deep all game. My criticism of Gary was that too many of his clearances went either up the middle of the pitch putting us under pressure or they went out of play. We all know that the clearances a goalie makes is a key part of the game and on Saturday he could have done better.

RedJ

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 18491
Re: Gary Woods
« Reply #63 on March 18, 2013, 09:41:04 pm by RedJ »
It was a difficult decision for the manager. There were a number of supporters, like me, who at this stage of the season would have welcomed the reassurance of seeing Sully playing especially after last week but Woods is the future and based on his performances this year deserves his position. I agree with many of the points made about the quality of the back passes and I would add to that, the fact that he was asked to play so many balls because for some reason our back line was really deep all game. My criticism of Gary was that too many of his clearances went either up the middle of the pitch putting us under pressure or they went out of play. We all know that the clearances a goalie makes is a key part of the game and on Saturday he could have done better.

You are Gary Woods and I claim my £5. ;)

In all seriousness this is a pretty fair summary. He doesn't exactly help himself with what he does but it isn't entirely his fault (although much of it is).

Norfolk N Chance

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Gary Woods
« Reply #64 on March 18, 2013, 09:44:23 pm by Norfolk N Chance »
he is a liability end off!

roversam

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1482
Re: Gary Woods
« Reply #65 on March 18, 2013, 10:02:58 pm by roversam »

CusworthRovers

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 3616
Re: Gary Woods
« Reply #66 on March 18, 2013, 10:09:37 pm by CusworthRovers »
We're clearly blinded by all the crapness and the amount of liabilities around as we have also missed:

Paul 'should never wear a rovers shirt' Keegan

Quinny, looks past it, no pace, lacking


In fact i think it's easier if we name our only players who aren't a liability or just simply crap:

Humey
Browny
Spurry

Those 3 are carrying the team and to be fair it's not worth any other player entering the pitch in a Rovers shirt, and for good measure we don't need a bench neither. It's those 3 v the rest. We are certain for relegation without a doubt.

I know I'm not going anymore and will only come back once we win the Champions League and buy Messi and Ronaldo. I think i will now throw my weight behind Barca, R Madrid or B Munich and all at the same time, incase one of them loses a game

ditch_drfc

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1498
Re: Gary Woods
« Reply #67 on March 18, 2013, 10:28:37 pm by ditch_drfc »
Oh well now you've put it like that Norfolk ...

bedale rover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 2520
Re: Gary Woods
« Reply #68 on March 19, 2013, 09:42:04 am by bedale rover »
 :cold: in light of all the devastating posts on this thread I think that the VSC forum should come under the umbrella of the new royal charter allowing the right of reply for all those wronged

Hacked off you have been!

grayx

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2265
Re: Gary Woods
« Reply #69 on March 19, 2013, 04:14:29 pm by grayx »
I was disappointed that Flynn chose to drop Sullivan. A safe, experienced pair of hands is exactly what we need for the run-in.

I was confused to be honest.
I can only think BF expected an easy game where Woods could start rebuilding his confidence.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012