0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Because he's not very good?
My take on Mackenzie is that we were happy for him to stay at Notts County for the duration. Then we picked up a bunch of injuries, especially in defence, so he was recalled. Unlike Main he didn't have an "I can stay here if I want" clause in his deal.Noticeable that since he's been back he's only been used as an emergency battering ram up front.I wouldn't be surprised to see him go out again this week.
Quote from: The Red Baron on March 21, 2016, 02:13:06 pmMy take on Mackenzie is that we were happy for him to stay at Notts County for the duration. Then we picked up a bunch of injuries, especially in defence, so he was recalled. Unlike Main he didn't have an "I can stay here if I want" clause in his deal.Noticeable that since he's been back he's only been used as an emergency battering ram up front.I wouldn't be surprised to see him go out again this week.So we play a left back at right back (ok he played very well on Saturday) then one of our smallest players at right CB when we have a 6 foot centre back on the bench. Granted he might not be that good (Although he played really well last season for Blackpool and Bradford). I just wonder is DF picking the best options at the back?
If you haven't got pace at the back, the next best thing is players who win a lot of headers, then you have to protect them on the ground.I see no point in playing Evina as a right back, if you want solidity you could play Taylor-Sinclair left back and Evina wide left, but then you haven't the crossing quality consistently. You could go something like the side below, and maybe play Rowe instead of Chaplow, but does that give impetus to a side also struggling to build confidence, for me you have to have a solid side, but one that has threat going forward. Stuckmann McKenzie Butler Alcock Taylor-Sinclair Keegan Chaplow Stewart Evina Williams Tyson
I can't believe you wouldn't play Coppinger.
Quote from: NickDRFC on March 22, 2016, 06:58:25 amI can't believe you wouldn't play Coppinger.We need him to be fit for all the games, just back from injury, i would start him on the bench. If you put him in for a full game, it's a big risk.
Quote from: keith79 on March 20, 2016, 11:49:25 pmHow many goals has tryson got so far this seasonThe only stat that matters is League goals. None of the cups matter now, we're out of them.Williams 10 and Tyson about 5 maybe 6. And I think Williams got 5 or 6 of those in one month and his record has been dogshite the rest of the seasonAm i right in thinking it's either seven or eight, and Williams is on about fourteen?.
How many goals has tryson got so far this season
Quote from: Sammy Chung was King on March 22, 2016, 12:25:43 amIf you haven't got pace at the back, the next best thing is players who win a lot of headers, then you have to protect them on the ground.I see no point in playing Evina as a right back, if you want solidity you could play Taylor-Sinclair left back and Evina wide left, but then you haven't the crossing quality consistently. You could go something like the side below, and maybe play Rowe instead of Chaplow, but does that give impetus to a side also struggling to build confidence, for me you have to hamve a solid side, but one that has threat going forward. Stuckmann McKenzie Butler Alcock Taylor-Sinclair Keegan Chaplow Stewart Evina Williams Tyson McCullough instead of KeeganEdina instead of ChaplowCoppinger instead of StewartRowe instead of Evina.Mandeville instead of Williams.
If you haven't got pace at the back, the next best thing is players who win a lot of headers, then you have to protect them on the ground.I see no point in playing Evina as a right back, if you want solidity you could play Taylor-Sinclair left back and Evina wide left, but then you haven't the crossing quality consistently. You could go something like the side below, and maybe play Rowe instead of Chaplow, but does that give impetus to a side also struggling to build confidence, for me you have to hamve a solid side, but one that has threat going forward. Stuckmann McKenzie Butler Alcock Taylor-Sinclair Keegan Chaplow Stewart Evina Williams Tyson
Quote from: Yorkiered on March 22, 2016, 07:32:19 amQuote from: Sammy Chung was King on March 22, 2016, 12:25:43 amIf you haven't got pace at the back, the next best thing is players who win a lot of headers, then you have to protect them on the ground.I see no point in playing Evina as a right back, if you want solidity you could play Taylor-Sinclair left back and Evina wide left, but then you haven't the crossing quality consistently. You could go something like the side below, and maybe play Rowe instead of Chaplow, but does that give impetus to a side also struggling to build confidence, for me you have to hamve a solid side, but one that has threat going forward. Stuckmann McKenzie Butler Alcock Taylor-Sinclair Keegan Chaplow Stewart Evina Williams Tyson McCullough instead of KeeganEdina instead of ChaplowCoppinger instead of StewartRowe instead of Evina.Mandeville instead of Williams.Edina instead of chaplow(I assume you meant Evina) then Rowe instead of Evina.Why not just put Rowe instead of Chaplow?As for Mandeville instead if Williams!!!!
Yorkie, working from memory here, always a bit dangerous with the few cells I have left but in addition to the cross for Copps' goal, wasn't it Williams' back heel that put Tyson in for the last goal previous we scored? and, and... some good work on the right for the cross that Chaplow scored from? I can't remember any other goals we've scored in that time and all of them set up by Williams.