0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I agree with the opening post that we're about one significant midfield signing away from having a squad that we should feel very positive about. If I was reading this as one of the Board members that has already financed some very proactive recruitment this summer, I'd be a little exasperated to see people (SWCK) saying we need to sign another five! Get in the real world. This is not Football Manager. The turnover has already been (admittedly necessarily) high and the loan market will be there for us to use as required. The key positive difference this time is that it should be a couple of loans to add to the team rather than a load of loans to build one.
Quote from: Jonathan on July 11, 2016, 12:19:14 pmI agree with the opening post that we're about one significant midfield signing away from having a squad that we should feel very positive about. If I was reading this as one of the Board members that has already financed some very proactive recruitment this summer, I'd be a little exasperated to see people (SWCK) saying we need to sign another five! Get in the real world. This is not Football Manager. The turnover has already been (admittedly necessarily) high and the loan market will be there for us to use as required. The key positive difference this time is that it should be a couple of loans to add to the team rather than a load of loans to build one.To be fair about it, i couldn't give a monkeys if the board are exasperated, they have recruited early but they had a part in us being in this mess in the first place.
Quote from: Sammy Chung was King on July 12, 2016, 01:10:27 amQuote from: Jonathan on July 11, 2016, 12:19:14 pmI agree with the opening post that we're about one significant midfield signing away from having a squad that we should feel very positive about. If I was reading this as one of the Board members that has already financed some very proactive recruitment this summer, I'd be a little exasperated to see people (SWCK) saying we need to sign another five! Get in the real world. This is not Football Manager. The turnover has already been (admittedly necessarily) high and the loan market will be there for us to use as required. The key positive difference this time is that it should be a couple of loans to add to the team rather than a load of loans to build one.To be fair about it, i couldn't give a monkeys if the board are exasperated, they have recruited early but they had a part in us being in this mess in the first place. What, even though they gave both managers funds to go and get who they wanted? Why do you genuinely seem to think we need an absolutely massive squad?
Carberry and Linley both went at the end of last season.
I'd still be tempted to give Stuckman another chance, in this league especially. It'd be interesting to know why he's out of favour cos I thought he did well before the dip last season, and even then still did better than other players.
The kind of player you're describing is about to cost Man u 100 mill. Were in L2. We get one attribute or the other. Players with more play at a higher level.
Quote from: Red wizard on July 10, 2016, 06:36:03 pmIf we can get him to stay fit. Still feel we need another like him.We need better than Paul he one dimensional when fit. He does not have pace, lacks technical ability, cannot get forward to assist with goal scoring, is not a creative player. He can defend apart against pace, breaks up play but that's it.
If we can get him to stay fit. Still feel we need another like him.
I watched the '1 good signing in midfield' last night at Rosso!