Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 04, 2024, 08:25:31 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: Not sure who was supposed to be at home!  (Read 4117 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

knockers

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1758
Re: Not sure who was supposed to be at home!
« Reply #30 on February 09, 2020, 09:03:35 am by knockers »
If we can’t buy Dieng then we should go for their keeper. He came for and held everything today meaning corners were of no threat at all!



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

mrfrostsdad

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3276
Re: Not sure who was supposed to be at home!
« Reply #31 on February 09, 2020, 09:19:01 am by mrfrostsdad »
Wasn't a defense lapse for there goal just nobody willing to tackle the player with the ball

The game should have been put to bed long before no one willing to have a shot apart from sadlier

It was schoolboy defending for their goal.
As soon as the scorer received the pass (nice pass- fair enough) I was screaming 'close him down, close him down' and both Anderson and Wright stood and watched him run 15 yards with the ball towards the box and get a shot away without getting even close to him. He hit it well, but that was as poor as a piece of defending as I've seen from us for a while.

They hardly looked like scoring apart from that. Ok, the effort that hit the bar in the first half. But whichever way you look at it, it was a very big defensive lapse

If Anderson or Wright had run the 10 yard to close him down he would’ve just slipped in the player that one of those two had left behind.
It was down to the midfield to break their necks to get back but gomes was just jogging

I'd have to watch it again Dickos, but I don't think they had anyone else that far forward did they? Maybe they did, I'll have another look

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29976
Re: Not sure who was supposed to be at home!
« Reply #32 on February 09, 2020, 09:23:42 am by drfchound »
If we can’t buy Dieng then we should go for their keeper. He came for and held everything today meaning corners were of no threat at all!






It would be interesting if we got their keeper.
I got the impression that lots of our fans didn’t like him yesterday.

Colin C No.3

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 4377
Re: Not sure who was supposed to be at home!
« Reply #33 on February 09, 2020, 09:25:33 am by Colin C No.3 »
Let’s face it Campsall we were awful in all 3rds
And if the goal line clearances had gone in and or we had got and scored that penalty and we had won 2-1 or 3-1 which on another day we would have done you would not have posted that would you.

Football has a very fine line between success and failure in many matches and although we didn’t play well if we had won no one would have cared a jot and most wouldn’t have even noticed we were below par.

Goals win matches. We only scored 1 and that’s cost us. As poor as we may have played we could have had 3/4 with a rub of the green.

And if my aunty had b***s she’d have been my uncle.

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17025
Re: Not sure who was supposed to be at home!
« Reply #34 on February 09, 2020, 09:26:28 am by dickos1 »
Wasn't a defense lapse for there goal just nobody willing to tackle the player with the ball

The game should have been put to bed long before no one willing to have a shot apart from sadlier

It was schoolboy defending for their goal.
As soon as the scorer received the pass (nice pass- fair enough) I was screaming 'close him down, close him down' and both Anderson and Wright stood and watched him run 15 yards with the ball towards the box and get a shot away without getting even close to him. He hit it well, but that was as poor as a piece of defending as I've seen from us for a while.

They hardly looked like scoring apart from that. Ok, the effort that hit the bar in the first half. But whichever way you look at it, it was a very big defensive lapse

If Anderson or Wright had run the 10 yard to close him down he would’ve just slipped in the player that one of those two had left behind.
It was down to the midfield to break their necks to get back but gomes was just jogging

I'd have to watch it again Dickos, but I don't think they had anyone else that far forward did they? Maybe they did, I'll have another look

Yes if you have a look, Wright had someone with him as did Anderson although James was trying to get back with that player.
But if they’d closed the player down either one of them would’ve been played in.

The fact is they just cruised through the middle of the park

Donnywolf

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 20619

the vicar

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7357
Re: Not sure who was supposed to be at home!
« Reply #36 on February 09, 2020, 10:16:10 am by the vicar »
Let’s face it Campsall we were awful in all 3rds
And if the goal line clearances had gone in and or we had got and scored that penalty and we had won 2-1 or 3-1 which on another day we would have done you would not have posted that would you.

Football has a very fine line between success and failure in many matches and although we didn’t play well if we had won no one would have cared a jot and most wouldn’t have even noticed we were below par.

Goals win matches. We only scored 1 and that’s cost us. As poor as we may have played we could have had 3/4 with a rub of the green.
and if my mum had a willy she would have been my dad. Campsall how can you defend that it was shit, even Ben Whiteman has more or less come out and admitted that
« Last Edit: February 09, 2020, 10:18:52 am by the vicar »

eastender

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 3826
Re: Not sure who was supposed to be at home!
« Reply #37 on February 09, 2020, 10:43:20 am by eastender »
If we can’t buy Dieng then we should go for their keeper. He came for and held everything today meaning corners were of no threat at all!

He's on loan from Brighton, so not much chance of getting him on a permanent deal, but may be on loan .

Campsall rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 14149
Re: Not sure who was supposed to be at home!
« Reply #38 on February 09, 2020, 10:50:23 am by Campsall rover »
Let’s face it Campsall we were awful in all 3rds
And if the goal line clearances had gone in and or we had got and scored that penalty and we had won 2-1 or 3-1 which on another day we would have done you would not have posted that would you.

Football has a very fine line between success and failure in many matches and although we didn’t play well if we had won no one would have cared a jot and most wouldn’t have even noticed we were below par.

Goals win matches. We only scored 1 and that’s cost us. As poor as we may have played we could have had 3/4 with a rub of the green.
and if my mum had a willy she would have been my dad. Campsall how can you defend that it was shit, even Ben Whiteman has more or less come out and admitted that
Vicar read my posts. WE DIDNT PLAY WELL. IT WAS POOR. I said that in my posts.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37614
Re: Not sure who was supposed to be at home!
« Reply #39 on February 09, 2020, 11:14:47 am by BillyStubbsTears »
Let’s face it Campsall we were awful in all 3rds
And if the goal line clearances had gone in and or we had got and scored that penalty and we had won 2-1 or 3-1 which on another day we would have done you would not have posted that would you.

Football has a very fine line between success and failure in many matches and although we didn’t play well if we had won no one would have cared a jot and most wouldn’t have even noticed we were below par.

Goals win matches. We only scored 1 and that’s cost us. As poor as we may have played we could have had 3/4 with a rub of the green.
and if my mum had a willy she would have been my dad.

I've never got that saying.

Surely if your mother had a cock, she'd be your post-op transsexual mother?

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012