0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Schofield’s body language decidedly nervous, looking very downbeat and twitchy on the touchline. Has he been given an ulimatum?
Quote from: Colemans Left Hook on April 18, 2023, 09:27:25 pmGillingham 2-0gills' recent goalscoring has relegated rovers to fourth worst gd in the lge. and two of them are looking good for the drop.
Gillingham 2-0
I’ve had a good look at Ravenhill now over a few games. I don’t see it, I just do not see him having a career playing pro football at league level.He’s lightweight, too slow, passing is mostly poor, I just do not see what he offers. He may look better with a stronger group around him, but I’m not sure at all.
Quote from: Thorney on April 18, 2023, 09:07:47 pmQuote from: StocksArmy on April 18, 2023, 08:48:11 pmBit controversial this but, the more i watch Faulkner the more I think he isnt good enough. And I know the team around him do him no favours at all but hes not great technically and positionally he is all over the place. Next season will be a big one for him in my opinion. James, Long, Close, Ravenhill, Agard also nowhere near good enough. Mitchell, Molyneux, Barlow, Hurst squad players at best.But some people think that because he likes to put his foot in then he's brilliant. His eagerness to win balls puts him out of position too much and yes isnt brilliant with the ball. Which was a reason why he was farmed out on loan.He was farmed out on loan because we don't know how to truly develop an exceptional talent. He's the best Rovers product for many a year. He's the one commanding that back line & he's 18.
Quote from: StocksArmy on April 18, 2023, 08:48:11 pmBit controversial this but, the more i watch Faulkner the more I think he isnt good enough. And I know the team around him do him no favours at all but hes not great technically and positionally he is all over the place. Next season will be a big one for him in my opinion. James, Long, Close, Ravenhill, Agard also nowhere near good enough. Mitchell, Molyneux, Barlow, Hurst squad players at best.But some people think that because he likes to put his foot in then he's brilliant. His eagerness to win balls puts him out of position too much and yes isnt brilliant with the ball. Which was a reason why he was farmed out on loan.
Bit controversial this but, the more i watch Faulkner the more I think he isnt good enough. And I know the team around him do him no favours at all but hes not great technically and positionally he is all over the place. Next season will be a big one for him in my opinion. James, Long, Close, Ravenhill, Agard also nowhere near good enough. Mitchell, Molyneux, Barlow, Hurst squad players at best.
Exceptional in the context of players to come through our academy though. No one will look good in this team. Both Ravenhill, if his contract is extended, and Faulkner would be well served by a full season in national league if they play most weeks.
no matter what you say we only lost 1-0 to both Stevenage and Gillingham - thats what the form book says