Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 30, 2024, 07:50:11 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: newcastle  (Read 2330 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

watto-drfc

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 927
newcastle
« on March 07, 2010, 06:30:07 pm by watto-drfc »
as i said earlier that if the 2 last man tackles on billy sharp had been on a newcastle striker at st james park both would have been red cards well just 1 week later and Barnsley goalkeeper gets a straight red when you can clearly see and the player admitted it afterwards that the goalkeeper never touched him.,



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

roverstillidie91

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 2161
Re:newcastle
« Reply #1 on March 07, 2010, 07:02:08 pm by roverstillidie91 »
true

personally i would introduce, just like the respect campaign for referees. If proven players are cheating, well not just in play i mean for like penalties and players getting sending off etc just fine them.

DaveDRFC

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 2002
Re:newcastle
« Reply #2 on March 07, 2010, 07:09:03 pm by DaveDRFC »
Apparently the ref has already said he gave the penalty for 'intent to foul' rather than actually fouling him.

Complete joke of a decision if that is true.

EDIT - Yes that is the case, just found this on BBC website...

Barnsley boss Mark Robins:
\"The disappointment was the sending-off, because that was the pivotal moment in the game.

\"It's dubious whether there was any contact made, but I am told by the referee now that the rule is that it's a trip or an attempt to trip in the penalty area, so I don't know.

\"The goalkeeper tells me he didn't make any contact and Peter Lovenkrands confirmed that after the game. He never touched him, but he had to go down.\"

Wellred

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4871
Re:newcastle
« Reply #3 on March 07, 2010, 07:28:43 pm by Wellred »
And the FA will do absolutely nothing to Lovenkrands just going to prove that the Respect campaign is a load of b*llocks.
Except of course when it suits the referees.

RobTheRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17382
Re:newcastle
« Reply #4 on March 07, 2010, 08:16:27 pm by RobTheRover »
To be fair to Lovenkrands, it looked like he was going to be clattered and he leapt out of the way, went down, but got straight back up to go for the ball.  He never once looked back at the ref, pleading for a pen like Andrew Johnson does.

RoversAlias

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11888
Re:newcastle
« Reply #5 on March 07, 2010, 08:23:03 pm by RoversAlias »
I don't think Lovenkrands tried to deceive the ref or anyone, he stumbled over because he had to get out of the way of the goalkeeper, and he did go after the ball after that.

NathanDRFC

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1127
Re:newcastle
« Reply #6 on March 07, 2010, 10:28:12 pm by NathanDRFC »
Wellred wrote:
Quote
And the FA will do absolutely nothing to Lovenkrands just going to prove that the Respect campaign is a load of b*llocks.
Except of course when it suits the referees.


The RESPECT campaign is working. As someone who is involved in implementing the campaign across South Yorkshire, I can tell you it is working. The campaign is to address behavior on the touchline (esp Sunday football), attitude of players, parents, officials and specators to match officals and likwise ref's attitudes to everyone.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012