0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
i played at a good standard mr yellow snow so no a good striker when i see one heffs is not in the box when we are attacking he just strolls about out wide .billy would be on the peno spot waiting to pounce
He is right though, Heff doesn't get in those areas that Sharp and even Hayter do. We have fans wanting us to move to the next level, and then fans saying Heffs should be kept, Heff will not take us up to the play off area, simple as that. What is it to be, stagnation or ambition?
Pudding. That post is precisely what folk mean when they say that statistics can be made to mean anything you want.
Before reading this thread I would have said that Heffernan was not a 20+ goal scorer in the Championship. I know BST has always been a supporter of Heffs and I read his comments with some reason to his wisdom. What has happened though is that we have not seen enough of Heffs this season to determine his true qualities in this team and this division.If I was a little critical of Heffs is that his tracking back has not been as successful as other teammates. Hayter recently has been very hard working for an example. I think that for a Donny team every member of the team has to learn to track back and try and win the ball.I think that Heffernan will be one of our players that will leave us this season and I remember him coming to Donny at a sunny Belle Vue open day and signing autographs for the kids.Well done Heffs I hope you get a good team and get some goals you have been a legend for us and I hope you continue to prosper.
BillyStubbsTears wrote:QuotePudding. That post is precisely what folk mean when they say that statistics can be made to mean anything you want.Blimey, I have read some rubbish and other drivel on this forum (even written some of it meself) but NEVER did I ever think I would see a post where BST slags someone of for using stats!!! I am so dumbstruck I almost cant write anymore....but...one more useless fact to throw into the argument, Heffs scored his goals last season in a team that contained for most of the time the creative talents of, Stock, Wellens, Woods and Coppinger. This season Billy Sharp has scored most of his goals in a midfield that contained the creative talent of Mark Wilson and A.N. Other
i wouldnt call it poor judgement, last season we didnt know we were going to have billy. if we didnt have billy then heffs probably would have had a decent run in the squad.
Save your wonderment Wilts. I DIDN'T slag anyone off for using stats. My gripe with Pudding was that he was using statistics in an illogical way to support a fallacious argument.Pudding basically said, \"I don't believe that Heffernan is good enough at this level and the stats back it up.\" You can believe what you want, but no matter what you believe, you cannot find statistics to demonstrate that Heffernan is not up to the mark as a goalscorer at this level. Heffernan has made 24 starts for us in this division. What Pudding did was to select Heffernan's last 5 starts as evidence that he's no good, and to ignore the previous 19. That is being a bit naughty with statistics, and THAT's why I raised an objection. I don't like people abusing the numbers.You could make a case that Wayne Rooney, Alan Shearer, Gary Lineker or Pele were shite if you ignored the matches when the scored and just presented stats from 5 starts when they hadn't scored.You could make a case that Sharp is no good at this level by ignoring the fact that he scored 14 goals in his first 26 starts and just highlighting the fact that he's scored just one penalty in his last 6 starts. But that would be fcuking stupid wouldn't it?As for your comments about the side when Heffernan was scoring last year, the argument is so full of holes it'd make a slice of Emmental look like a lead ingot.1) The wonderful midfield that you quoted from last season was the one that took us to the bottom of the league by Xmas. So, no matter HOW good they were, they obviously weren't putting goals on a plate for anyone. Until Heffernan was finally selected. The fact was that Heffernan came into a side where goals were as rare as rocking horse shite, and immediately started scoring the goals that saved our bacon. That alone demonstrates that he is perfectly competent at this level if selected.2) Maybe I should stop aleing at matches, cos I'm sure I've regularly seen the likes of John Oster and Jamie Coppinger playing in midfield this season in the same side as Billy Sharp. You might know better.3) In any case, what has Billy Sharp got to do with it? The discussion was whether Heffernan was competent at this level.I'm constantly bemused by this driving need that so many of our fans seem to have to pour scorn on the best goalscorer that we have had on contract for the thick end of 50 years. Bizarre behaviour, but it must fulfill a need in some folks' lives.
'kin 'ell, I've got me own stalker. Earlier this season you were claiming to have been looking at me cock in the West Stand bogs, now you're running www.wisewordsofBST.com.For the record, just in case any impressionable kids might get the idea that I am less than scrupulously honest in my use of statistics, the comments that you are referring to were as follows:1) I pointed out the fact that our run of 2 points and 4 goals from 12 games in Sept-Oct 2008 was worse than any run of 12 games that we had in 97-98, and was probably the worst extended run of form we had endured in living memory.2) I pointed out that by the time Heffernan was finally selected in 2008-09, our goals per game record was significantly worse than it was in 1997/98.Those things were said as part of a debate about whether our continued insistence on picking anyone in the Doncaster area with a work permit, 2 legs roughly the same length as each other, a pair of buttocks and an arsehole* to play up front before we'd select Heffernan was a good idea or not. One or two soft lads on here interpreted those statistical observations as me saying that we were worse than Weaver's side. Their choice.*NB: Those 4 were mutually inclusive requirements, not individual descriptions of the other centre forwards that we selected in the dark days of Autumn 2008. Easy mistake to make mind.
As for your comments about the side when Heffernan was scoring last year, the argument is so full of holes it'd make a slice of Emmental look like a lead ingot.1) The wonderful midfield that you quoted from last season was the one that took us to the bottom of the league by Xmas. So, no matter HOW good they were, they obviously weren't putting goals on a plate for anyone. Until Heffernan was finally selected. The fact was that Heffernan came into a side where goals were as rare as rocking horse shite, and immediately started scoring the goals that saved our bacon. That alone demonstrates that he is perfectly competent at this level if selected.
2) Maybe I should stop aleing at matches, cos I'm sure I've regularly seen the likes of John Oster and Jamie Coppinger playing in midfield this season in the same side as Billy Sharp. You might know better.
3) In any case, what has Billy Sharp got to do with it? The discussion was whether Heffernan was competent at this level.
I'm constantly bemused by this driving need that so many of our fans seem to have to pour scorn on the best goalscorer that we have had on contract for the thick end of 50 years. Bizarre behaviour, but it must fulfill a need in some folks' lives.