0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
just because a certain player doesnt fit in at a certain doesnt mean the players not good enough. sharp didnt at sheffield united and remember how poor john sheridan looked playing for us.
Championship quality - I'm sorry but no. And as was posted earlier 23 other managers felt the same as SoD. However I'd have had him these past six weeks, but you can't keep players in squad and on the payroll in case of a severe injury crisis.
Lockwood was a regular until injured last season. Hird played as a starter often last season and is almost always on bench. Wilson regular sub. Heff would've been no where near the first 16 until the 3 injuries in first 2 games. And probably still wouldn't have made first 11 in past few weeks.And I wrote severe injury crisis not just in case of injury.
It was an 18 man squad in that season and heff was in it though didn't get on the pitch a great deal. If anything it was the headbutt sending off at Southend that got SoDs back up.
Quote from: \"andysly\" post=184251It was an 18 man squad in that season and heff was in it though didn't get on the pitch a great deal. If anything it was the headbutt sending off at Southend that got SoDs back up.He was actually our equal top league scorer that season, including a proflic run in the winter when Hayter was injured.Actually, whatever Heffernan did to piss off O'Driscoll pre-dated that stupid headbutt by a good length of time. O'Driscoll has rarely criticised individuals in his time here, but Heffernan was an exception, drawing critical press comments from O'Driscoll almost from the off.I fully appreciate that Heffernan was never the style of striker that O'Driscoll preferred. He's always wanted strikers who work hard for the cause outside the box as well as sticking the ball in the back of the net.With Sharp, and sometimes with Hayter, you get both. Heffernan was never in that mould, and that clearly irritated O'Driscoll, certainly judging by his public comments. But it's no co-incidence that two of our best runs under O'Driscoll (Dec 06-Jan07 and Dec08-Feb09) came when we played to Heffernan's strengths. The lesson I take from this is that there is more than one way to skin a cat, and more than one way to set out a successful football side.The really key moment for me in O'Driscoll's approach to Heffernan came in April 09, after we'd beaten Ipswich to more or less secure our Championship status. Heffernan scored in that game - his eight goal in the last 14-15 starts. He was immediately dropped. We went into the next game with Hayter and Guy up front and Heffernan on the bench. We lost and to be honest, we were dreadful, looking woefully short of punch. Other sides near the bottom won that day and suddenly we were potentially being dragged down into the relegation scrap again. Heffernan was immediately recalled, and scored as we won comfortably at Plymouth to finally all-but put relegation behind us. O'Driscoll's post-match interview went into raptures about how well Hayter had played, and what a vital player he was for us. Not a single mention of the bloke who had scored the goals that had actually saved us. That always seemed a strange couple of weeks - as if O'Driscoll genuinely resented the player who had been so central to saving our season.And by the way, of course this is ancient history, but the fact that it raises so much interest 2-3 years down the line is indicative of the fact that it is one of the 2 most controversial issues during O'Driscoll's reign - the other being his preference from Wilson over Green for most of that dire run in 2008.All in the past, but, Jonathan-permitting, I guess we're allowed to discuss our past?