0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
We shouldn't even be in his radar.
If the boat is going to be pushed out it needs to be on another Billy Sharp, or a Mills/Shackell defender that is proven at Championship level or lost their way at Premiership level. Not Diouf.
Quote from: \"comeonrovers\" post=186496We shouldn't even be in his radar.My point exactly. You need to ask the question why are we.
I'm getting his name on my shirt whether we sign him or not.
Just been on his twitter page and what a complete wonker! Dont know how to feel about this I want his talent but don't want the attitude.
To the people saying they'd prefer we got in a defender and a goal keeper, who's good enough right now and available on a free transfer?I'd rather the money went to keeping Lalkovic all season but if the money is there for both I have no objections to Diouf coming. I'd rather preserve our status as a Championship side than a family club( and I'm sure if our wholesome image can survive Oster and Hayter getting arrested the night before the Boro game it can survive Diouf winding up the opposition fans)
Free agents can still be signed
After tonight we have one game on Saturday then we do not play till 14th October. So we could sign Diouf and then loan some players just before the Leeds game. Lalkovic can only stay while middle of November 91 days after he first signed. So if we loan players at the beginning of October we can have them until the transfer window opens again.
Quote from: \"steve@dcfd\" post=186617After tonight we have one game on Saturday then we do not play till 14th October. So we could sign Diouf and then loan some players just before the Leeds game. Lalkovic can only stay while middle of November 91 days after he first signed. So if we loan players at the beginning of October we can have them until the transfer window opens again.Lalkovic is a youth loan, I think the rules are different, he could theoretically play tonight for us, play for Chelsea reserves tomorrow and then play again for us on Saturday
I don't care if kicking babies is part of his pre game ritual. If he scores goals he'll do.
Dioufy FoundationAll this he`s a t**t is his stage persona I reckon
And did you have stand there mute when Jimmy Kelly played? How is Diouf's behaviour (going by your moral compass) deemed worse than kicking someone to death outside a club? Oster's actions with the air gun are hardly praisewrothy either. Do you refuse to applaud him as well? Brooker did a bit of jail time as well. Did you refuse to cheer his goals against Watford and Leicester? And the Sunderland video is hardly harmless fun for all the family. Do you not give Woods and Brown the time of day either?I'm just looking for an indication of some consistency in how you approach rovers players with dubious pasts?
No one is sayin that our other players havent been naught boys, but any sort of behaviour like his towards KIDS and takin the pi$$ out of disabled ones at that is lower than low. No? Sorry if you think this is acceptable behaviour for role models for our young fans but for me we already have better players at the club that are far more respectable and thats all i@m going to say on the matter.
Quote from: \"TommyC\" post=186657And did you have stand there mute when Jimmy Kelly played? How is Diouf's behaviour (going by your moral compass) deemed worse than kicking someone to death outside a club? Oster's actions with the air gun are hardly praisewrothy either. Do you refuse to applaud him as well? Brooker did a bit of jail time as well. Did you refuse to cheer his goals against Watford and Leicester? And the Sunderland video is hardly harmless fun for all the family. Do you not give Woods and Brown the time of day either?I'm just looking for an indication of some consistency in how you approach rovers players with dubious pasts?He probably doesn't know who Jimmy Kelly is!