0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
You really are a c*** sorry to anyone who takes offence to that. Apart from wabtec
Question for the happyclappers and playground bullies on here,will your hero ever walk straight into another job now Northampton dont want him.When/if he does get a job you could run a bus to his new clubs matches,on the way there show re runs of the tactical geniuses interviews,but be warned anyone falling asleep would have their signed foto of him taken away and not returned,and if you fall asleep again you would be made to read all of VIVA ROVERS scribblings that should be a big enough deterrent for anyone.on the way back there could be a discussion on his most stupid and idiotic substitutions,that should keep you going there,s enough of em.
i thought he can apply for jobs i can and im in work it would be a matter of compensation but im sure we wouldent ask 4 any so we could stop paying him
Just to be clear. I know 100% that O'Driscoll was getting the Pompey job but they (understandably now) couldn't/wouldn't pay the compensation to wipe out his gardening leave. O'Driscoll was fuming and went to the training ground last week and had to be escorted off and is now banned.I never post these \"i've heard\" shite posts, but this time I am going to because the thread dictated it.This comes from a player who, in his own words, had never seen O'Driscoll lose it like that.Looks like the Rovers / O'Driscoll relationship has totally collapsed.
Can we just ignore pointless threads like this and just leave it to the usual suspects to burn effigies of SoD on their own.
Quote from: \"PaulRover08\" post=202762Just to be clear. I know 100% that O'Driscoll was getting the Pompey job but they (understandably now) couldn't/wouldn't pay the compensation to wipe out his gardening leave. O'Driscoll was fuming and went to the training ground last week and had to be escorted off and is now banned.I never post these \"i've heard\" shite posts, but this time I am going to because the thread dictated it.This comes from a player who, in his own words, had never seen O'Driscoll lose it like that.Looks like the Rovers / O'Driscoll relationship has totally collapsed.I suppose he's in a difficult position isn't he? I mean, if he's on \"gardening leave\" and allegedly on full pay and has a contract for another 18 months (is it 18 months?) then it's either a case of another club paying off his contract to drfc or SOD waiving that contract? Thinking about it, I would have thought it was easy, when he gets another job can't he just waive the remainder of his contract like he would if he had got the Burnley job or the Sheffield United job? I'm not trying to inflame an argument, she wondering what's stopping him moving on?
Quote from: \"benaldo\" post=202771Quote from: \"PaulRover08\" post=202762Just to be clear. I know 100% that O'Driscoll was getting the Pompey job but they (understandably now) couldn't/wouldn't pay the compensation to wipe out his gardening leave. O'Driscoll was fuming and went to the training ground last week and had to be escorted off and is now banned.I never post these \"i've heard\" shite posts, but this time I am going to because the thread dictated it.This comes from a player who, in his own words, had never seen O'Driscoll lose it like that.Looks like the Rovers / O'Driscoll relationship has totally collapsed.I suppose he's in a difficult position isn't he? I mean, if he's on \"gardening leave\" and allegedly on full pay and has a contract for another 18 months (is it 18 months?) then it's either a case of another club paying off his contract to drfc or SOD waiving that contract? Thinking about it, I would have thought it was easy, when he gets another job can't he just waive the remainder of his contract like he would if he had got the Burnley job or the Sheffield United job? I'm not trying to inflame an argument, she wondering what's stopping him moving on?Surely in the case of him still being paid, if he takes another job he should waive the contract, with possibly the new club paying what would be any shortcoming in the difference between new wages and old. IF he's wanting his cake and eat it I have zero sympathy with what is a money grabbing ploy.
Quote from: \"Bristol Red Rover\" post=202775Quote from: \"benaldo\" post=202771Quote from: \"PaulRover08\" post=202762Just to be clear. I know 100% that O'Driscoll was getting the Pompey job but they (understandably now) couldn't/wouldn't pay the compensation to wipe out his gardening leave. O'Driscoll was fuming and went to the training ground last week and had to be escorted off and is now banned.I never post these \"i've heard\" shite posts, but this time I am going to because the thread dictated it.This comes from a player who, in his own words, had never seen O'Driscoll lose it like that.Looks like the Rovers / O'Driscoll relationship has totally collapsed.I suppose he's in a difficult position isn't he? I mean, if he's on \"gardening leave\" and allegedly on full pay and has a contract for another 18 months (is it 18 months?) then it's either a case of another club paying off his contract to drfc or SOD waiving that contract? Thinking about it, I would have thought it was easy, when he gets another job can't he just waive the remainder of his contract like he would if he had got the Burnley job or the Sheffield United job? I'm not trying to inflame an argument, she wondering what's stopping him moving on?Surely in the case of him still being paid, if he takes another job he should waive the contract, with possibly the new club paying what would be any shortcoming in the difference between new wages and old. IF he's wanting his cake and eat it I have zero sympathy with what is a money grabbing ploy.Its not necessarily money-grabbing. We had a similar situation with Paterson, Rigoglioso and Jackson. Player (or manager) becomes surplus to requirements but isn't offered a contract he feels suitable so doesn't move. That's the case with contracts and no one would do any different. But then again the rules around managers on gardening leave don't seem clear anyway - IF it is the case he can't talk to other clubs at the moment then its an irrelevant point as he can't be offered a deal in the first place.
...if you fall asleep again you would be made to read all of VIVA ROVERS scribblings that should be a big enough deterrent for anyone...
Quote from: \"DonnyNoel\" post=202776Quote from: \"Bristol Red Rover\" post=202775Quote from: \"benaldo\" post=202771Quote from: \"PaulRover08\" post=202762Just to be clear. I know 100% that O'Driscoll was getting the Pompey job but they (understandably now) couldn't/wouldn't pay the compensation to wipe out his gardening leave. O'Driscoll was fuming and went to the training ground last week and had to be escorted off and is now banned.I never post these \"i've heard\" shite posts, but this time I am going to because the thread dictated it.This comes from a player who, in his own words, had never seen O'Driscoll lose it like that.Looks like the Rovers / O'Driscoll relationship has totally collapsed.I suppose he's in a difficult position isn't he? I mean, if he's on \"gardening leave\" and allegedly on full pay and has a contract for another 18 months (is it 18 months?) then it's either a case of another club paying off his contract to drfc or SOD waiving that contract? Thinking about it, I would have thought it was easy, when he gets another job can't he just waive the remainder of his contract like he would if he had got the Burnley job or the Sheffield United job? I'm not trying to inflame an argument, she wondering what's stopping him moving on?Surely in the case of him still being paid, if he takes another job he should waive the contract, with possibly the new club paying what would be any shortcoming in the difference between new wages and old. IF he's wanting his cake and eat it I have zero sympathy with what is a money grabbing ploy.Its not necessarily money-grabbing. We had a similar situation with Paterson, Rigoglioso and Jackson. Player (or manager) becomes surplus to requirements but isn't offered a contract he feels suitable so doesn't move. That's the case with contracts and no one would do any different. But then again the rules around managers on gardening leave don't seem clear anyway - IF it is the case he can't talk to other clubs at the moment then its an irrelevant point as he can't be offered a deal in the first place.I only meant its money grabbing IF overall the new contract leaves him with less money. Between Rovers and the new club, I'd expect the difference in wages to be made up. SOD wanting more than that, ie same wages PLUS a pay off is out of order as he doesn't end up loosing.
I suppose this, in a nutshell, shows the problem on the forum. Someone posts something about SOD (or Saunders), then two or three people swear at the poster without even debating the point. The OP may well be trying to get a rise, but there are ways to argue without calling someone a c%^&.