0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
When your as good as he is, you can afford to play some shocking shots.Murray was good though, and I feel he will win a grand slam at some point.
Unlucky murray !!! Think with federer nadal and djokovic around cant see him clinching Wimbledon
Unfortunately for Wiggins two factors are detracting from his efforts:1. The absence of Andy Schleck and Alberto Contador.2. Sky reneging on their promise to be whiter than white when it comes to doping issues.
Quote from: The L J Monk on July 13, 2012, 11:31:53 amUnfortunately for Wiggins two factors are detracting from his efforts:1. The absence of Andy Schleck and Alberto Contador.2. Sky reneging on their promise to be whiter than white when it comes to doping issues.You are being somewhat unkind there LJ, you may as well say itxs underminded because Eddie Merckx and Lance Armstrong are not in it. If Rovers win next years League I will it be undermined because Sheff W or Charlton are not in it? And surely your No2 point undermines no1 when you namecheck the biggest drug cheat in current cycling?I presume you are referring to the appointment of the Rabobank doctor as an advisor? I dont wish to get too boring on this but see Millars' comments after todays win and Brailsford's the other day.http://road.cc/content/news/61543-dave-brailsford-defends-team-skys-employment-former-rabobank-doctor
I'd personally rank the Olympics above Wimbledon. I don't even like tennis but was enthralled watching him today, it's a shame they couldn't make it 2 golds in the mixed doubles.
Murray wins AT Wimbledon is different to Murray WINS Wimbledon