Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 03, 2024, 03:31:16 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: Keegan  (Read 12861 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Wellred

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4871
Keegan
« on December 29, 2012, 08:41:08 pm by Wellred »
Come on then Norfolk. You should be home from the game by now.
Personally I thought he had a good game today and certainly a better game than Bennett.



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

Woodhead Passer

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1316
Re: Keegan
« Reply #1 on December 29, 2012, 08:42:43 pm by Woodhead Passer »
IMO no one played poor, apart from Bennett.

Keegan didn't put a foot wrong today

Norfolk N Chance

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Keegan
« Reply #2 on December 29, 2012, 08:44:10 pm by Norfolk N Chance »
Come on then Norfolk. You should be home from the game by now.
Personally I thought he had a good game today and certainly a better game than Bennett.

4 fouls given away in first 20 mins?

Yes totally inspired!

Wellred

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4871
Re: Keegan
« Reply #3 on December 29, 2012, 08:45:59 pm by Wellred »
Come on then Norfolk. You should be home from the game by now.
Personally I thought he had a good game today and certainly a better game than Bennett.

4 fouls given away in first 20 mins?

Yes totally inspired!

Oh you noticed he was getting stuck in then? Some very poor decisions from the referee today didn't help him either.

Norfolk N Chance

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Keegan
« Reply #4 on December 29, 2012, 08:47:46 pm by Norfolk N Chance »
Thought Bennett had a half decent game

Too honest too as the GK clipped his heals in first half for certain pen

sirfoxinthebox

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 88
Re: Keegan
« Reply #5 on December 29, 2012, 08:48:29 pm by sirfoxinthebox »
IMO no one played poor, apart from Bennett.

Keegan didn't put a foot wrong today
bennett played well that what i would like to see from him more often

Wellred

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4871
Re: Keegan
« Reply #6 on December 29, 2012, 08:49:11 pm by Wellred »
Thought Bennett had a half decent game

Too honest too as the GK clipped his heals in first half for certain pen

Well I guess for you to say Bennett had a half decent game he must have been p**s poor then.

Norfolk N Chance

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Keegan
« Reply #7 on December 29, 2012, 08:50:56 pm by Norfolk N Chance »
Thought Bennett had a half decent game

Too honest too as the GK clipped his heals in first half for certain pen

Well I guess for you to say Bennett had a half decent game he must have been p**s poor then.

No he was good today, he got the pen too.




Wellred

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4871
Re: Keegan
« Reply #8 on December 29, 2012, 08:52:33 pm by Wellred »
Thought Bennett had a half decent game

Too honest too as the GK clipped his heals in first half for certain pen

Well I guess for you to say Bennett had a half decent game he must have been p**s poor then.

No he was good today, he got the pen too.





Put it this way I would have given everyone more marks than him.

Norfolk N Chance

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Keegan
« Reply #9 on December 29, 2012, 08:54:18 pm by Norfolk N Chance »
Thought Bennett had a half decent game

Too honest too as the GK clipped his heals in first half for certain pen

Well I guess for you to say Bennett had a half decent game he must have been p**s poor then.

No he was good today, he got the pen too.





Put it this way I would have given everyone more marks than him.

He effected the game.

What did keegan do apart from give ball away and foul?

Wellred

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4871
Re: Keegan
« Reply #10 on December 29, 2012, 08:56:52 pm by Wellred »
Thought Bennett had a half decent game

Too honest too as the GK clipped his heals in first half for certain pen

Well I guess for you to say Bennett had a half decent game he must have been p**s poor then.

No he was good today, he got the pen too.





Put it this way I would have given everyone more marks than him.

He effected the game.

What did keegan do apart from give ball away and foul?

There is no point in arguing with someone who is so obviously blinkered.

Norfolk N Chance

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Keegan
« Reply #11 on December 29, 2012, 09:01:26 pm by Norfolk N Chance »
Thought Bennett had a half decent game

Too honest too as the GK clipped his heals in first half for certain pen

Well I guess for you to say Bennett had a half decent game he must have been p**s poor then.

No he was good today, he got the pen too.





Put it this way I would have given everyone more marks than him.

He effected the game.

What did keegan do apart from give ball away and foul?

There is no point in arguing with someone who is so obviously blinkered.

did he not commit four fouls within first 20 mins?

Norfolk N Chance

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Keegan
« Reply #12 on December 29, 2012, 09:06:20 pm by Norfolk N Chance »
Thought Bennett had a half decent game

Too honest too as the GK clipped his heals in first half for certain pen

Well I guess for you to say Bennett had a half decent game he must have been p**s poor then.

No he was good today, he got the pen too.





Put it this way I would have given everyone more marks than him.

He effected the game.

What did keegan do apart from give ball away and foul?

There is no point in arguing with someone who is so obviously blinkered.

did he not commit four fouls within first 20 mins?

The reason?

Cos he does not think quick enough

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17014
Re: Keegan
« Reply #13 on December 29, 2012, 09:06:47 pm by dickos1 »
Keegan was excellent today no doubt about it, he might not have a great touch, vision etc but he broke up a lot of the play today and gave it simple.
The first half today I thought painter was dreadful prestons best player, Bennett was a bit better I think he's lacking confidence, his old man was sat near me and as soon as he got brought off he left and didn't seem happy at all

Norfolk N Chance

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Keegan
« Reply #14 on December 29, 2012, 09:10:04 pm by Norfolk N Chance »
Keegan was excellent today no doubt about it, he might not have a great touch, vision etc but he broke up a lot of the play today and gave it simple.
The first half today I thought painter was dreadful prestons best player, Bennett was a bit better I think he's lacking confidence, his old man was sat near me and as soon as he got brought off he left and didn't seem happy at all

He wasnt excellent at all!


big fat yorkshire pudding

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 13644
Re: Keegan
« Reply #15 on December 29, 2012, 09:13:49 pm by big fat yorkshire pudding »
Keegan played well, he broke up play, scrapped and passed it well.  He's not always the right choice, today he played well.  I also thought Paynter had a good game and held it up very well, him and Syers linked up well, though I thought Paynter should have stayed on his feet and shot for his penalty shout, contact but he could have carried on.

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17014
Re: Keegan
« Reply #16 on December 29, 2012, 09:14:09 pm by dickos1 »
In your opinion mate, but even if you thought he was you wouldn't bring yourself to admit it on here.
All sides need someone to break up play and protect our back four and today in my opinion he did an excellent job.

donnievic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3632
Re: Keegan
« Reply #17 on December 29, 2012, 09:16:00 pm by donnievic »
Also thought keagan was superb again today could of easily got booked in 1st twenty mins when ref pulled him up for 4 fouls even though he clearly won the ball for one of them and for me between him and Sayers for MOM.the ref was shit all game still not sure if the pen he gave was either,as for Bennett think the reason he didn't go down was because he wasn't touched by their keeper but overall I would put it up there in our best 2 performances along with notts county

Donnybax

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2393
Re: Keegan
« Reply #18 on December 29, 2012, 10:45:10 pm by Donnybax »
I was stood near you Norfolk, all you did was hound keegan for every little thing he did. He was decent today.

RedJ

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 18491
Re: Keegan
« Reply #19 on December 29, 2012, 10:48:35 pm by RedJ »
Norfolk you're mental if you think Bennett was good and Keegan was b*llocks today. I'm sorry but you are. Keegs was class and Bennett as usual did very little other than "earn" a penalty.

Norfolk N Chance

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Keegan
« Reply #20 on December 29, 2012, 10:49:42 pm by Norfolk N Chance »
I was stood near you Norfolk, all you did was hound keegan for every little thing he did. He was decent today.

If you call having banter hounding.


Donnybax

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2393
Re: Keegan
« Reply #21 on December 29, 2012, 11:01:10 pm by Donnybax »
It really wasn't banter. It did become banter when someone picked you up on it because it was becoming laughable

Norfolk N Chance

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Keegan
« Reply #22 on December 29, 2012, 11:16:05 pm by Norfolk N Chance »
It really wasn't banter. It did become banter when someone picked you up on it because it was becoming laughable

Ok we will have to agree to disagree.

Donnybax

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2393
Re: Keegan
« Reply #23 on December 30, 2012, 12:06:33 am by Donnybax »
We will and I'm not keegans biggest fan, far from it but I really think he did well today

Norfolk N Chance

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Keegan
« Reply #24 on December 30, 2012, 12:10:48 am by Norfolk N Chance »
We will and I'm not keegans biggest fan, far from it but I really think he did well today

He had one of his better games agreed

Glyn_Wigley

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 12021
Re: Keegan
« Reply #25 on December 30, 2012, 12:18:43 am by Glyn_Wigley »
It really wasn't banter. It did become banter when someone picked you up on it because it was becoming laughable

Ok we will have to agree to disagree.


What's your definition of the difference between 'banter' and 'abuse' then?
« Last Edit: December 30, 2012, 12:24:20 am by Glyn_Wigley »

Glyn_Wigley

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 12021
Re: Keegan
« Reply #26 on December 30, 2012, 12:39:58 am by Glyn_Wigley »
What's your definition of the difference between 'banter' and 'abuse' then?

Come on, Norfolk, I know you've read this thread since I wrote the above...

If you're going to hide behind a defence of 'banter' then at least have the courage of your conviction and answer my question.

RedJ

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 18491
Re: Keegan
« Reply #27 on December 30, 2012, 12:46:52 am by RedJ »
It's abuse when someone slags off his beloved Bennett and Woods and banter when he slags off players he doesn't like, primarily Keegan this season.

Norfolk N Chance

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Keegan
« Reply #28 on December 30, 2012, 12:52:19 am by Norfolk N Chance »
It's abuse when someone slags off his beloved Bennett and Woods and banter when he slags off players he doesn't like, primarily Keegan this season.

All about opinions all about opinions.

Just like people around me slagging Bennett off for every little thing.

Abuse who mentioned abuse?

I was frustrated that he had fouled 4 times within 20 mins and voiced my opinion!

After that I was having banter with the people around me.....

You want to get your facts right or better still by all means we can share a pint and chat through my reasons.


RedJ

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 18491
Re: Keegan
« Reply #29 on December 30, 2012, 12:54:04 am by RedJ »
Abuse, er you tore him apart on here yesterday and by what I gather from this thread you did the same at Deepdale.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012