0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
See nothing has been said about it but if it had been Keegan or Bennett who had gone down sure alot would have been on there back about it
He never got the ball otherwise it would've been a corner. #fact
Quote from: donnievic on February 10, 2013, 01:46:04 pmSee nothing has been said about it but if it had been Keegan or Bennett who had gone down sure alot would have been on there back about itI thought it was a penalty, the player caught him, Cotts got to the ball before him but made the most of going down, outside of the box it`s a free kick, inside and it`s considered a dive
He should have been sent off it was that bad. He didnt even argue the booking which tells you it was a dive.
Why do we need a thread like this ?What a joke , someone trying to get at Rovers most effective player, check his stats for assists & goals !
Quote from: GazLaz on February 10, 2013, 03:27:41 pmHe should have been sent off it was that bad. He didnt even argue the booking which tells you it was a dive. No it doesn't - it might tell you that last week he realised having a go at the officials about a poor decision wont reverse it and will get you booked again an in this case with a joke of a ref probably sent off.Strange how the ref then let the keeper take the resultant kick from where Cotts went to ground outside the 6 yard box?
Definitely caught him but I don't think it was enough to take him down the way Cotts went to ground. Looked an obvious dive.
I sit right behind the goal in the south stand and it was a clear dive their player was no were near cotts and you could see clear day light when cotts went down , but from another part of the ground it may well look like a penalty it was the only thing the ref got correct all game.
I wonder if the speed at which he was running was what took him down more than the contact, though, and the forward/downward momentum that he'd have gotten from a mixture of the two.