0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: ditch_drfc on March 18, 2013, 09:11:56 amI can't actually believe how everyone is slating Woods! It's our shit performance that threw away the win. If our players felt like getting into space and creating chances then maybe we'd have won. But we didn't, they didn't get into space, they didn't create many chances, they never looked at who wanted the ball. Cotterill was on the wing most of the game in space wanting the ball, how many times did he get it? How many times was the ball passed backwards to Woods under too much pressure, forcing him to slice the ball? We need to stop passing back to Woods, we do it more than any other team i've ever seen! Hang on, arent you the one that stated earlier that Sully is shit, that one statement tells me that you know f**k all about football IMO.
I can't actually believe how everyone is slating Woods! It's our shit performance that threw away the win. If our players felt like getting into space and creating chances then maybe we'd have won. But we didn't, they didn't get into space, they didn't create many chances, they never looked at who wanted the ball. Cotterill was on the wing most of the game in space wanting the ball, how many times did he get it? How many times was the ball passed backwards to Woods under too much pressure, forcing him to slice the ball? We need to stop passing back to Woods, we do it more than any other team i've ever seen!
Quote from: roversam on March 18, 2013, 09:32:44 amQuote from: ditch_drfc on March 18, 2013, 09:11:56 amI can't actually believe how everyone is slating Woods! It's our shit performance that threw away the win. If our players felt like getting into space and creating chances then maybe we'd have won. But we didn't, they didn't get into space, they didn't create many chances, they never looked at who wanted the ball. Cotterill was on the wing most of the game in space wanting the ball, how many times did he get it? How many times was the ball passed backwards to Woods under too much pressure, forcing him to slice the ball? We need to stop passing back to Woods, we do it more than any other team i've ever seen! Hang on, arent you the one that stated earlier that Sully is shit, that one statement tells me that you know f**k all about football IMO.And you are not that far behind him IMO
am i thanks for the promotion
Yeah and my point is that when given the choice between a 43 year old has been and a 22 year old goalkeeper with potential to be good at this level i know who i'd choose. When people get off Woods' back and stop booing him every game, maybe he'll pick up some confidence.
Quote from: donnievic on March 18, 2013, 10:12:30 amam i thanks for the promotion its ok anytime, when's your next meeting? is it still in that phone box on sandringham road.
He got some shocking backpasses from the defenders yesterday, and the pitch didnt help when he was trying to clear them.
Quote from: drfc1951 on March 17, 2013, 06:55:11 pmHe got some shocking backpasses from the defenders yesterday, and the pitch didnt help when he was trying to clear them.Exactly, Im the first to call him when he is at fault. However he did nothing wrong on Satdi........why are some unnecessarily on the attack again ? It's bloody ridiculous, did he miss gilt edge chances against Pompey ? Of course NOT, it is a team game and the errors were NOT his!
how can he miss guilt edged chances hoola, i dont remember him going up for corners
And here we go again - lets have a go at Gary Woods - not at fault for the goal yesterday but still we have a go.Give him a breakCotterill supplied the ball yet again for our goal so how s he not doing his bit !COYRP.S. Remember its a team game and in my opinion he had a better game than Cotterill did, who has been poor for quite some time now and no one has a go at him!
Quote from: roversam on March 17, 2013, 11:07:07 pmQuote from: MiKA on March 17, 2013, 11:02:08 pmI thought Woodsy did fine yesterday, a lot better than I'd expect actually due to our own fans constantly on his back. what did he do fine as you put it, he had nowt to do, if Woods had been in their goal we would have won 3 or 4-1.So if Woods was in their goal we would have magically created more chances? We had like 2 chances the whole game. Give over, don't make if as if their goalkeeper made save after save.
Quote from: MiKA on March 17, 2013, 11:02:08 pmI thought Woodsy did fine yesterday, a lot better than I'd expect actually due to our own fans constantly on his back. what did he do fine as you put it, he had nowt to do, if Woods had been in their goal we would have won 3 or 4-1.
I thought Woodsy did fine yesterday, a lot better than I'd expect actually due to our own fans constantly on his back.
Quote from: DonnyOsmond on March 18, 2013, 08:14:51 amQuote from: roversam on March 17, 2013, 11:07:07 pmQuote from: MiKA on March 17, 2013, 11:02:08 pmI thought Woodsy did fine yesterday, a lot better than I'd expect actually due to our own fans constantly on his back. what did he do fine as you put it, he had nowt to do, if Woods had been in their goal we would have won 3 or 4-1.So if Woods was in their goal we would have magically created more chances? We had like 2 chances the whole game. Give over, don't make if as if their goalkeeper made save after save.FFS we missed two incredible easy chances in first half and Furman brought a wonder save out of their keeper 9 shots at goal 4 on target of which we were unlikely or should have scored with all four.Paynter 2 yard out header/ Brown one on one with keeper and Furman powerfully struck shot plus goal we scored Get your facts right!
Amazing how we have a two page thread on Gary Woods when apart from fumbling one shot and some wayward kicking (not helped by the pitch) he didn't do anything wrong on Saturday.
Quote from: Norfolk N Chance on March 18, 2013, 11:14:50 amQuote from: DonnyOsmond on March 18, 2013, 08:14:51 amQuote from: roversam on March 17, 2013, 11:07:07 pmQuote from: MiKA on March 17, 2013, 11:02:08 pmI thought Woodsy did fine yesterday, a lot better than I'd expect actually due to our own fans constantly on his back. what did he do fine as you put it, he had nowt to do, if Woods had been in their goal we would have won 3 or 4-1.So if Woods was in their goal we would have magically created more chances? We had like 2 chances the whole game. Give over, don't make if as if their goalkeeper made save after save.FFS we missed two incredible easy chances in first half and Furman brought a wonder save out of their keeper 9 shots at goal 4 on target of which we were unlikely or should have scored with all four.Paynter 2 yard out header/ Brown one on one with keeper and Furman powerfully struck shot plus goal we scored Get your facts right!If we are talking about getting facts right can I point out that it was Paynter who had the one on one
I was disappointed that Flynn chose to drop Sullivan. A safe, experienced pair of hands is exactly what we need for the run-in.
You forgot a few Cussy:- Martin Woods. Can't do much right these days, and he's always injured. He's a liability.- Harper. A clear liability- Sully. Way too old. He's a liability- Kyle Bennett. Lost his way. Liability. We should cash in on him, if we can, asap.BobG