0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
"I understand that there are still minor issues regarding image rights and Louis Tomlinson. But parties remain "positive" deal can be done."
Are you sure that TB And DW and DB still want to run the club. My opinion only. I am not sure they still want to be here, DW health and TB may have had enough, just a thought. Let's wait and see.
Just reject it already! It's clear as day what is happening... The plan is to market the f*ck out of Louis Tomlinson's 'image'! If it wasn't, the image rights issue would have been sorted by now!Do we really want to be a part of whoring ourselves out to some boy band member? F*ck that for a game of scrabble!! WE ARE A FOOTBALL CLUB - Remember that people!Tomlinson OUT!John Ryan, Terry Bramall & Dick Watson IN!
According to Andy Giddings anyway. Quote"I understand that there are still minor issues regarding image rights and Louis Tomlinson. But parties remain "positive" deal can be done."
I'd rather go into liquidation than ever support a football club that's selling itself out as much as we will be with this takeover. Sorry but that's my opinion and it's my right.I feel strongly about what the meaning of a football club means to me, and what I am willing to accept or not accept. When/if this deal does go through (please god don't), I will be taking an interesting look at peoples opinions one year down the line.
Quote from: RedJ on June 10, 2014, 03:57:05 pmAccording to Andy Giddings anyway. Quote"I understand that there are still minor issues regarding image rights and Louis Tomlinson. But parties remain "positive" deal can be done."RedJ.Sorry to be pedantic but Andy Giddings is not saying the announcement is postponed. It may be these minor issues are resolved in the next 24 hours. Lets wait and see
Like is said... We'll see people's thoughts 1 year down the line possibly even sooner.It's no wonder fans get mugged off so easily, because they just accept anything and everything out of blind "loyalty". Football fans truly are pathetic.
Wellred. Hypothetical question. Would you be happy to see your club taken over by someone who had made millions from, say child slavery?It's an extreme example, but everyone (I hope) has limits. It's not for us to tell other people what theirs should be.
As I've posted before the scrutiny always has to be on the people wanting to buy the club. If we're all now waiting on the question of who or who does not own LT's face then it is him who needs to provide the answers. He also needs to tell us why hes investing the club and his plans for the future.
Quote from: drfc-steve on June 10, 2014, 04:54:34 pmLike is said... We'll see people's thoughts 1 year down the line possibly even sooner.It's no wonder fans get mugged off so easily, because they just accept anything and everything out of blind "loyalty". Football fans truly are pathetic. If things were accepted out of blind loyalty then surely everyone would have been behind the original SC deal as JR was in favour of it?
Quote from: Copps is Magic on June 10, 2014, 04:57:55 pmAs I've posted before the scrutiny always has to be on the people wanting to buy the club. If we're all now waiting on the question of who or who does not own LT's face then it is him who needs to provide the answers. He also needs to tell us why hes investing the club and his plans for the future. LT does not have to explain anything,( He may well do so, but its not a requirement ) in the same way as TB/DW didn't. They were introduced as a "Faite Accomply", that's what LT /JR/and whoever else is involved are , should the TO go through.
Quote from: Wild Rover on June 10, 2014, 05:03:53 pmQuote from: Copps is Magic on June 10, 2014, 04:57:55 pmAs I've posted before the scrutiny always has to be on the people wanting to buy the club. If we're all now waiting on the question of who or who does not own LT's face then it is him who needs to provide the answers. He also needs to tell us why hes investing the club and his plans for the future. LT does not have to explain anything,( He may well do so, but its not a requirement ) in the same way as TB/DW didn't. They were introduced as a "Faite Accomply", that's what LT /JR/and whoever else is involved are , should the TO go through.Err, I might be wrong here because I didn't go to them but weren't TB and DW present at quite a few 'meet the owners' and other such nights to answer questions both pre- and post- John Ryan?[/quoteQuote from: Copps is Magic on June 10, 2014, 05:07:08 pmQuote from: Wild Rover on June 10, 2014, 05:03:53 pmQuote from: Copps is Magic on June 10, 2014, 04:57:55 pmAs I've posted before the scrutiny always has to be on the people wanting to buy the club. If we're all now waiting on the question of who or who does not own LT's face then it is him who needs to provide the answers. He also needs to tell us why hes investing the club and his plans for the future. LT does not have to explain anything,( He may well do so, but its not a requirement ) in the same way as TB/DW didn't. They were introduced as a "Faite Accomply", that's what LT /JR/and whoever else is involved are , should the TO go through.Err, I might be wrong here because I didn't go to them but weren't TB and DW present at quite a few 'meet the owners' and other such nights to answer questions both pre- and post- John Ryan?Im talking about when they "Came on Board".
Quote from: Wild Rover on June 10, 2014, 05:03:53 pmQuote from: Copps is Magic on June 10, 2014, 04:57:55 pmAs I've posted before the scrutiny always has to be on the people wanting to buy the club. If we're all now waiting on the question of who or who does not own LT's face then it is him who needs to provide the answers. He also needs to tell us why hes investing the club and his plans for the future. LT does not have to explain anything,( He may well do so, but its not a requirement ) in the same way as TB/DW didn't. They were introduced as a "Faite Accomply", that's what LT /JR/and whoever else is involved are , should the TO go through.Err, I might be wrong here because I didn't go to them but weren't TB and DW present at quite a few 'meet the owners' and other such nights to answer questions both pre- and post- John Ryan?