0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
The questions were very soft and gentle and nothing like the ones put forward on the VSC, why? who selected the questions? Thats why the VSC should be there asking searching questions, they should have been there! Patsy springs to mind!
WhyOwhy does every thread descend into this??
and as far as I'm aware a VSC director was present at the club today
So they do work for the club then... fancy that.
Quote from: GazLaz on June 27, 2014, 08:05:36 pmSo they do work for the club then... fancy that. I would argue we work for both the fans and the club.
Until the takeover is completed can we sign a player?
RD:Quote from: Mr1Croft on June 27, 2014, 07:38:36 pm and as far as I'm aware a VSC director was present at the club today
We, on the VSC forum, responded to an article requesting questions that we wanted asking of the new regime. It seems to me that no one took them forward.
I am a lot clearer on SLO's and their job description and they should not be offended by the questions I posted.To represent the club and the supporters I thought that was the role of the VSC?As RD says "Is the VSC been driven out"? Who was the VSC director present? I would like to know why he never took the questions forward that we were asked to formulate.I never saw any comment made about the strength of questions? We, on the VSC forum, responded to an article requesting questions that we wanted asking of the new regime. It seems to me that no one took them forward.If you read back I was not disrespectful to the SLO's I was asking questions thus showing an interest in the workings of the club. You can only be critical when you have the facts and that can only be achieved by asking questions in the particular case.Sad,Drivel, really?, some of the questions you pose leave me standing in the area of drivel! You are making a mountain out of a molehill. In any voluntary position, such as the SLO's, you must accept questioning and I am sure they accept that when they volunteered.
I am a lot clearer on SLO's and their job description and they should not be offended by the questions I posted.To represent the club and the supporters I thought that was the role of the VSC?As RD says "Is the VSC been driven out"? Who was the VSC director present? I would like to know why he never took the questions forward that we were asked to formulate.I never saw any comment made about the strength of questions? We, on the VSC forum, responded to an article requesting questions that we wanted asking of the new regime. It seems to me that no one took them forward.If you read back I was not disrespectful to the SLO's I was asking questions thus showing an interest in the workings of the club. You can only be critical when you have the facts and that can only be achieved by asking questions in the particular case.
Where is the VSC in all of this, is it now a defunct organisation ?Noting that this meeting included the SLOs , which other bodies were invited to this meeting Lee ?
AIMH, questioning by all means, I'm sure Lee or Dave would welcome your questions but why accuse them of being Patsies? Their role is communication between fans and the club. I'm sure they'll welcome your apology for your little outburst.
Quote from: Sad-Rovers on June 27, 2014, 11:15:27 pmAIMH, questioning by all means, I'm sure Lee or Dave would welcome your questions but why accuse them of being Patsies? Their role is communication between fans and the club. I'm sure they'll welcome your apology for your little outburst. One question answered:http://www.doncasterfreepress.co.uk/sport/doncaster-rovers/doncaster-rovers-takeover-not-dependent-on-crowdfunder-1-6698591If the new regime were planning to use this income stream to purchase the club I don't think the football authorities would have accepted it. I wonder if they only just found that out?Sad,Read my comments again! I did not say he/they were Patsy's did I? I voiced my concern at the level of questions.You are jumping to conclusions and note that Lee never took offence at my comments.There are bucket loads of good questions that remain unanswered just read back but just one concerns me at the moment "Will Ryan pay off the debts at the end of the season"?Personally the mission statement of Prem league is not really that important to me and I won't hold Ryan to it. The only objective I would put on the new regime is I want the team to be competitive and the club kept out of crippling debt.One more question Lee "why did you not use the questions the forum posters asked"?
It wouldn't surprise me if the club never talk to the VSC again.
Quote from: GazLaz on June 28, 2014, 09:38:18 amIt wouldn't surprise me if the club never talk to the VSC again. Why would that be?