0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: silent majority on October 24, 2015, 02:13:39 pmI don't suppose PD acknowledges his part in trying to get rid of the current Chairman either.You are quite fond of dropping in these interesting little insights.Perhaps the CEO should be more careful what he tells you in future.
I don't suppose PD acknowledges his part in trying to get rid of the current Chairman either.
Surely if he tried to get rid o. The chairman they would of just sacked him
Also said its important his next job is one where he has 'half a chance'
Quote from: Lifelong supporter on October 24, 2015, 02:51:43 pmQuote from: silent majority on October 24, 2015, 02:13:39 pmI don't suppose PD acknowledges his part in trying to get rid of the current Chairman either.You are quite fond of dropping in these interesting little insights.Perhaps the CEO should be more careful what he tells you in future.The CEO didn't tell me anything. It's not like you to make assumptions Dave, oh, then again yes it is!! I do have other sources as I have to keep reminding you. Unlike you I'm not on anyone's payroll.
Quote from: bpoolrover on October 24, 2015, 02:48:06 pmSurely if he tried to get rid o. The chairman they would of just sacked himBe careful to read what I wrote. I said he played a part, not that he was the main instigator. Furthermore it's possible that the current board might not have been aware themselves, either then or now.
No its not gossip. I have something in my possession.
Jay, Paul Dickov was our 10th longest serving manager in the post-war era. Our sacking of him has nothing to do with modern football. In fact, we as a club have stuck with managers far longer in the last 15 years than our past history dictates or in comparison other football league clubs. The facts don't support the argument you're making.We'd be in exactly the same position with Paul Dickov as manager as we are now. Expect we'd be in a worse position because we'd still have Paul Dickov as manager! A man with no ability to get a team of players playing well on a consistent basis. It was absolutely the right decision to get rid of him and only now is it apparent what a mess he has left us in. The majority of this squad (if not every single member) was either signed or re-signed under him. He has to take responsibility for that because he's the man in charge of footballing affairs.
No way. Lifelong is Diamond Dave Morris then.
Given human decency and the fact it doesn't have to be an "act" to be a nice guy, I think he's being kind and oversimplifying the entire situation.The actual situation was one where he had not one but two pre-seasons totally botched and sabotaged, and then still stuck by us. He brought in players this summer, we had a cracking set of friendlies, and then suddenly after just 6 games, he was sacked. So in actuality, he was judged on 6 games ever. Which is the absurdity of modern football and the quick-fix culture we live in. That's that.Now, though, like Jones was, Ferguson is still dealing with the same bunch of players. If you keep them, you might as well have kept Dickov anyway because he brought them in to fit his own plans, not anyone else's. So now, as we see today, we have the same bunch of players making poor performances, and they've got to go. We can have our little scapegoats and gut reactions and knee-jerk responses on Praise or Grumble, but bottom line is, the team is Dickov's, and without Dickov, it then becomes, well, even worse.Let's hope Ferguson has a healthy budget and the nerve to ship players in - and out - and is at least given till Christmas by the eMpTyV generation to turn his team around.
I'm purely guessing because whoever it is simply peddles the tired old Ryan agenda. It's boring.
Quote from: silent majority on October 24, 2015, 04:31:03 pmNo its not gossip. I have something in my possession.Is it as useful as the piece of paper that Neville Chamberlain waved about?
Sorry. I'm 100% sure it's Dave Lee Travis.
Quote from: PDX_Rover on October 24, 2015, 06:43:23 pmI'm purely guessing because whoever it is simply peddles the tired old Ryan agenda. It's boring.I have my suspicions as to who LS might be, but I think you have to be 100% certain before you "out" someone on a public forum.