Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 23, 2024, 04:13:49 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: Is Roy right?  (Read 23000 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37468
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #180 on June 26, 2016, 11:13:01 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
Aaaannndddd...we get back to the point of the thread.

Thank you Hound.



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

eastender

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 3826
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #181 on June 26, 2016, 11:37:23 pm by eastender »
Wasn't Spain 96 a draw.





If you are saying that we didnt beat Spain (because we only got through on pens) then that makes our record quite a bit better.
I feel much better now knowing that the Germans didnt beat us in that 96 semi final  !!

To be pedantic , we only beat Spain because they had a perfectly good goal disallowed for off side. :)


dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 16968
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #182 on June 26, 2016, 11:47:45 pm by dickos1 »
England beat Wales
Wales beat Slovakia
England drew with Slovakia

Bradford beat Chelsea rovers beat Bradford we're better than chelsea

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37468
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #183 on June 27, 2016, 12:43:14 am by BillyStubbsTears »
Dickos.

An England team with six changes drew withSlovakia.

Aaaaaaannnddd... we get back to the point of the thread.

Sammy Chung was King

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 9679
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #184 on June 27, 2016, 01:33:49 am by Sammy Chung was King »
Does Roy's decision, look better in hindsight, when we look at how the republic of ireland, visibly tired in the second half. Or can we really only decide that, if we beat iceland?.
I have seen a fair few teams, who have either gone down the rotating players route, and the playing the same side every game route, and it looks better for the rotating teams.
The problem is, most of the sides who have kept the same side, tend to be the weaker nations who have less options to play with, it's hard to judge for me.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29872
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #185 on June 27, 2016, 09:09:41 pm by drfchound »
Wasn't Spain 96 a draw.





If you are saying that we didnt beat Spain (because we only got through on pens) then that makes our record quite a bit better.
I feel much better now knowing that the Germans didnt beat us in that 96 semi final  !!

To be pedantic , we only beat Spain because they had a perfectly good goal disallowed for off side. :)




To be pedantic back then, Argentina only beat us in France because Sol Campbell had a perfectly good goal disallowed.
Come to think of it, if Lampards shot had crossed the line the Germans might not have beaten us that day.

Rich_The_Conisbrough_Rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 753
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #186 on June 27, 2016, 11:48:47 pm by Rich_The_Conisbrough_Rover »
Sterling, wilshere, smalling.. Definitely shouldn't haven't been at the tournement, feel for Ross Barkley, brilliant play but don't understand why Roy didnt see that.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37468
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #187 on June 27, 2016, 11:50:15 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
Barkley?

Here's a thought.

Because he's even more clueless and more of a liability than the cack that played tonight?

Chris Black come back

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 14352
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #188 on June 28, 2016, 12:14:56 am by Chris Black come back »
Made this point last week. Take no pleasure in saying I was absolutely right - but I was absolutely right.

We have been soundly defeated by a country the size of Donny.

Total embarrassment but not unexpected in any way, shape or form. When will folk realise?

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37468
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #189 on June 28, 2016, 12:27:53 am by BillyStubbsTears »
Wasn't Spain 96 a draw.





If you are saying that we didnt beat Spain (because we only got through on pens) then that makes our record quite a bit better.
I feel much better now knowing that the Germans didnt beat us in that 96 semi final  !!

To be pedantic , we only beat Spain because they had a perfectly good goal disallowed for off side. :)




To be pedantic back then, Argentina only beat us in France because Sol Campbell had a perfectly good goal disallowed.
Come to think of it, if Lampards shot had crossed the line the Germans might not have beaten us that day.

Hound. Go and have a look at the video again, and watch Shearer's arm.

And while you're at it, watch Owen's dive for the early penalty.

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 16968
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #190 on June 28, 2016, 06:43:52 am by dickos1 »
Give over billy, you could go through every game in history and find silly things like that,

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37468
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #191 on June 28, 2016, 07:38:00 am by BillyStubbsTears »
Dickos

The point being, of course, that we weren't unfairly treated in that game. I was responding to Hound's implication that we had been.
« Last Edit: June 28, 2016, 07:52:10 am by BillyStubbsTears »

Metalmicky

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5518
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #192 on June 28, 2016, 07:40:29 am by Metalmicky »
At least Roy Hodgson had a coherent plan on how we should exit Europe.....

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29872
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #193 on June 28, 2016, 07:45:47 pm by drfchound »
Dickos

The point being, of course, that we weren't unfairly treated in that game. I was responding to Hound's implication that we had been.




Billy, there are very many goals in very many games that could be ruled out if the letter of the law was upheld and the refs spotted all the wrongdoings.
What about the greatest wrongdoing of all time (probably), that is Maradonnas' handball goal.
Maybe they wouldnt have won that day if the goal had been ruled out and Diego had been red carded for cheating and ungentlemanly conduct?



Bentley Bullet

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 19645
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #194 on June 28, 2016, 07:56:07 pm by Bentley Bullet »
Made this point last week. Take no pleasure in saying I was absolutely right - but I was absolutely right.

Total embarrassment but not unexpected in any way, shape or form. When will folk realise?

Funny, that's what a lot of folk said about Rovers last season while others were saying they'd reach the play-offs! And those that did predict right were condemned as petulant ingrates!

When will folk realise indeed!

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37468
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #195 on June 28, 2016, 07:57:05 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
Hound

Follow your logic.

You're saying that because refs sometimes miss infringements, they should ignore all infringements? Or if we commit a foul which the ref sees, we're hard done to and are justified in feeling cheated?

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29872
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #196 on June 28, 2016, 08:03:33 pm by drfchound »
No Billy, i am just stating a fact, that is all.
We (our teams) have got away with just as many as we have committed.
Originally i responded to a comment which said we drew with Spain (because we had only won on pens) which had (IMO) been made to worsen our record in tournaments (bringing down our win ratio -see what i mean).
I made my not being beaten by the Germans in 96 comment to equal that out (by bringing down our defeats ratio ).
I know you will still be with me.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37468
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #197 on June 28, 2016, 08:05:55 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
Hound

In your words, we had "a perfectly good goal" disallowed against Argentina.

I say, "no we didnt". Shearer's forearm went into the keeper's face. It was a foul. It was a correct decision.

That was all we were talking about. The rest is irrelevant.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29872
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #198 on June 28, 2016, 08:09:32 pm by drfchound »
Well, it wasn't all that i was talking about.
I still say that there will have been loads of goals allowed in similar circumstances, for and against us.
That goal of Campbells could quite easily have been allowed by a different ref or even the same ref on another day.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37468
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #199 on June 28, 2016, 08:11:10 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
But. It. Was. A. Foul.

Therefore it wasn't "a perfectly good goal". Therefore there is nothing to complain about. Your complaint boils down to the fact that the referee didn't make a mistake.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29872
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #200 on June 28, 2016, 08:13:08 pm by drfchound »
In the words of the Knight in The Quest for the Holy Grail, "lets call this a draw then".

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37468
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #201 on June 28, 2016, 08:17:13 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
Aye.

Penalties?

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29872
Re: Is Roy right?
« Reply #202 on June 28, 2016, 08:20:13 pm by drfchound »
See you in the park in the morning then.
I have a ball.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012