0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Colin C No.3 on December 12, 2016, 02:48:41 pm7500+posts, all excellent, informative, dare I say ground breaking. If there was a literary prize on this forum you would walk it. Plus & it's a big plus, never once have I detected any hint of sarcasm.I'm never ignored though.
7500+posts, all excellent, informative, dare I say ground breaking. If there was a literary prize on this forum you would walk it. Plus & it's a big plus, never once have I detected any hint of sarcasm.
Quote from: BobG on December 11, 2016, 09:42:05 pmFrom 1986 to 2003, dear boy, the Rovers average crowd never came close to exceeding 4,000. In only 2 of those 18 seasons did it even exceed 3,000 and in another two, it was less than 2,000. So what are you trying to suggest? I'm still wondering what facts there could possibly be that make you say the home attendance for Grimsby should be 5,000 minimum. You've offered zero reasons so far. As far as I know all the evidence we have points to a different, lower, conclusion - so put me right please rather than giving a smart arse answer again. If there is a good reason, I'll applaud and I'll be very happy indeed. I wish it was nearer 10,000 than the 5,000 you suggested. All I want to know is what reason(s) make you suggest it.BobGIt's pointless looking at what attendances were back then as so much as changed. I predicted the attendance levels to be what they are at the moment and was immediately shot down by the majority who stated if we're near the top of the league we'd be getting as many, if not more than we were last season. This isn't the case. In my opinion we should be getting more than what we are. But while ever the club does nothing in terms of marketing and promotion, it won't happen. I frequent other clubs social media and websites to get a gauage on how they do things, and they all promote the hell out of upcoming fixtures at ticket sales. All we have for the Grimsby match Is a nicely designed banner which you can only see by going to the page itself. And that's just for starters. Oh and if SM wants to chip in I've contacted the club with suggestions and had no reply.
From 1986 to 2003, dear boy, the Rovers average crowd never came close to exceeding 4,000. In only 2 of those 18 seasons did it even exceed 3,000 and in another two, it was less than 2,000. So what are you trying to suggest? I'm still wondering what facts there could possibly be that make you say the home attendance for Grimsby should be 5,000 minimum. You've offered zero reasons so far. As far as I know all the evidence we have points to a different, lower, conclusion - so put me right please rather than giving a smart arse answer again. If there is a good reason, I'll applaud and I'll be very happy indeed. I wish it was nearer 10,000 than the 5,000 you suggested. All I want to know is what reason(s) make you suggest it.BobG
There's a reason why we're a lower league club, and it's not because of the fanbase. It's because of the lack of ambition of the owners over the years - apart from a couple of occasions when we were inspired by Peter Doherty and John Ryan.
Having only 5000 home fans dictates how ambitious they can be.
We had a crap chippy in Bentley. Nobody went apart from a handful of easily pleased punters. Then an ambitious new owner took over and soon they were the best fish and chips for miles.It's packed all the time now.
We averaged just over 3,500 fans in our last season in the conference. Following our promotion to league 2 the average almost doubled. When we reached the Championship our attendances rose again by over 50%.As a result of our decline (2 relegations in the last 3 seasons), our crowds have decreased. Confidence in the club rising again has diminished.
We've let people in for free before and not filled the ground. People just don't care.
Can you still pay on gate for Saturdays game?