0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Maybe we should consider our own and America's foreign policies and question why North Korea are so intent on developing nuclear weapons to aim at the Americans. To start we may want to question why the Americans have ran over a 1500 nuclear tests since 1945 and North Korea have undertaken 6 and question again who is the realProblem in this scenario.
Quote from: aidanstu on September 07, 2017, 06:52:11 amMaybe we should consider our own and America's foreign policies and question why North Korea are so intent on developing nuclear weapons to aim at the Americans. To start we may want to question why the Americans have ran over a 1500 nuclear tests since 1945 and North Korea have undertaken 6 and question again who is the realProblem in this scenario.Have the Americans fired nuclear missiles over neighbouring countries of late?
Quote from: drfchound on September 07, 2017, 10:22:51 amQuote from: aidanstu on September 07, 2017, 06:52:11 amMaybe we should consider our own and America's foreign policies and question why North Korea are so intent on developing nuclear weapons to aim at the Americans. To start we may want to question why the Americans have ran over a 1500 nuclear tests since 1945 and North Korea have undertaken 6 and question again who is the realProblem in this scenario.Have the Americans fired nuclear missiles over neighbouring countries of late?Has anyone? A missile 'capable' of carrying a nuclear warhead maybe.
Peace is not an option for the US, it's economy relies on selling arms and ammunition.I found this article about US/Korea very interesting. http://www.4thmedia.org/2017/04/the-problem-is-washington-not-north-korea/#comment-4340672[/quotWhat really really gets my goat about the yanks is they do are matters far worse after sticking their oars in at times.Look at Afghanistan ,they only stuck their two bobs worth in that country because Afghanistan was having running battles against the Russians ,and the Russians back then were yanks only real threat .So yanks get involved in Afghanistan by supplying them arms and training just to piss the Russians off and now look how many yank troops have been sent back in body bags from that region .
Quote from: nightporter on September 07, 2017, 09:33:04 amPeace is not an option for the US, it's economy relies on selling arms and ammunition.I found this article about US/Korea very interesting. http://www.4thmedia.org/2017/04/the-problem-is-washington-not-north-korea/#comment-4340672[/quotWhat really really gets my goat about the yanks is they do are matters far worse after sticking their oars in at times.Look at Afghanistan ,they only stuck their two bobs worth in that country because Afghanistan was having running battles against the Russians ,and the Russians back then were yanks only real threat .So yanks get involved in Afghanistan by supplying them arms and training just to piss the Russians off and now look how many yank troops have been sent back in body bags from that region .A conspiracist would say it was more about taking over the supply of the opiate manufacturing trade in Afghanistan. Others would say it was in retaliation for the acts of Obama bin laden but if that was the case you would have to question why they flew the family out of America immediately after 9/11
Yes it was known as Operation Cyclone. Although not quite organised by 'some pillock'. It was a proper CIA run operation.Also not quite true about Bin Laden. Bin Laden was in Afghanistan during this period, he was one of the Mujahideen fighting the Soviets. It is disputed if he was ever directly trained and armed by the Yanks, but he was there and they provided arms and training.
Thanks for filling all the missing gaps in mr wilts.why did the CIA feal the need to get involved by backing the Afghan fighters ?
Last but not least ,did the CIA backing of the afghans back then lead America right into today's mess that they have to put boots on Afghan soil to try to clear up present day mess.?
ooohhh theres some incredibly knowledgeable people on on here who know exactly what governments are/were thinking. feck me do we have half a dozen prime ministers and senior cabinet ministers posting on here am I surprised well tbh no
I wonder what both china and Russia would do if said fired missile was going over their land.I guess it would not be a watered down solution to the problem.Don't the japs have anti missile launchers that would knock any NK missile fired across them.
Well the japs or anyone else should should blow out of the sky any missile that's going over their airspace .I mean the Russians have taken out aircraft that have wondered off by mistake into its airspace before.