Total Members Voted: 147
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
I know, one poor month out of 9 excellent ones and only rovers fans would bang on about that one month
Quote from: dickos1 on September 28, 2017, 07:03:02 amWe won every single game in January last season, we also got 10 points from 15 in march. Don't squash the myth, Dickos. Fans will keep finding a way to write off our excellent promotion last season so long as it serves the "Fergie out" agenda.
We won every single game in January last season, we also got 10 points from 15 in march.
Were talking about our promotion season mate august to April
We were talking about the promotion season, somebody suggested our season fell apart from the turn of the year onwards, it didn't, We had one bad month out of 9 in the season, yet people pick up on the one bad month which by the way was after promotion was clinched
Do you honestly think there's any side in the country that goes 9 months without a slight blip? It's ridiculous, we had a couple of games that we didn't win. So what? We got promoted with 5 games to spare.Enjoy it don't start looking at months where we drew a few games It's crazy
What about months where we collapsed spectacularly after having 9 fingers on the trophy twice?
Quote from: dickos1 on September 28, 2017, 01:04:16 pmDo you honestly think there's any side in the country that goes 9 months without a slight blip? It's ridiculous, we had a couple of games that we didn't win. So what? We got promoted with 5 games to spare.Enjoy it don't start looking at months where we drew a few games It's crazyI actually didnt say that teams don't go 9 months without a blip did I ?It was you who brought that up.
with all this talk about fergie v dickov people must be presuming fergie was allowed by blunt to get the players he wanted during the 1st transfer window he was in charge
Quote from: legendslounger on September 28, 2017, 04:28:57 pmwith all this talk about fergie v dickov people must be presuming fergie was allowed by blunt to get the players he wanted during the 1st transfer window he was in chargeDidn't DF go on record as saying he was happy with what he had and didn't need to sign anyone?
Quote from: drfchound on September 28, 2017, 08:46:23 pmQuote from: legendslounger on September 28, 2017, 04:28:57 pmwith all this talk about fergie v dickov people must be presuming fergie was allowed by blunt to get the players he wanted during the 1st transfer window he was in chargeDidn't DF go on record as saying he was happy with what he had and didn't need to sign anyone?hes not going to say otherwise in public. and in a new job.
Quote from: legendslounger on September 28, 2017, 08:49:23 pmQuote from: drfchound on September 28, 2017, 08:46:23 pmQuote from: legendslounger on September 28, 2017, 04:28:57 pmwith all this talk about fergie v dickov people must be presuming fergie was allowed by blunt to get the players he wanted during the 1st transfer window he was in chargeDidn't DF go on record as saying he was happy with what he had and didn't need to sign anyone?hes not going to say otherwise in public. and in a new job.So how does anyone know that he was refused the funds, guesswork I suppose.
Quote from: drfchound on September 28, 2017, 08:52:59 pmQuote from: legendslounger on September 28, 2017, 08:49:23 pmQuote from: drfchound on September 28, 2017, 08:46:23 pmQuote from: legendslounger on September 28, 2017, 04:28:57 pmwith all this talk about fergie v dickov people must be presuming fergie was allowed by blunt to get the players he wanted during the 1st transfer window he was in chargeDidn't DF go on record as saying he was happy with what he had and didn't need to sign anyone?hes not going to say otherwise in public. and in a new job.So how does anyone know that he was refused the funds, guesswork I suppose.is contrary your default position? if it doesn't fit with your understanding you just dismiss it and argue the opposite.