Total Members Voted: 187
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Maybe our owners are star struck by having Ferguson senior as a match day attendee.
Quote from: drfchound on October 03, 2017, 09:56:30 amI do think that there are quite a number of supporters who are beginning to lean towards "go" but are reluctant to say so.Managers come and go don't they but the club and the fans remain.If DF is sacked we will obviously get someone new and who knows, we may well see an upturn in our fortunes on the pitch.Maybe our owners are star struck by having Ferguson senior as a match day attendee.Agree with most of that bar the last point; they're not teenagers, they are not going to keep employing a manager if they think he can't turn around our form just because they want to cosy up to his famous dad. I believe that they believe that DF is still the right man for the job (I'm undecided), and as soon as they think otherwise I've no doubt they will look to change it.
I do think that there are quite a number of supporters who are beginning to lean towards "go" but are reluctant to say so.Managers come and go don't they but the club and the fans remain.If DF is sacked we will obviously get someone new and who knows, we may well see an upturn in our fortunes on the pitch.Maybe our owners are star struck by having Ferguson senior as a match day attendee.
I suspect that quite understandably given the laser-like focus of the Board on making the club financially sustainable, that the Ferguson record of picking up players young on modest wages and flogging them for big sums is quite attractive. There are many in this category in our current squad - Wright, Lawlor, Ben Khemis, Mason, May, Beestin, Garratt, Marquis etc. Striking looking at that Saunders team of “mesters” how few of them had any resale value or were the right side of 30. So whatever the results on the pitch I can see the attraction to the Board of Ferguson as a manager who fits neatly into the overall strategy for the club.
Quote from: Chris Black come back on October 03, 2017, 10:28:08 amI suspect that quite understandably given the laser-like focus of the Board on making the club financially sustainable, that the Ferguson record of picking up players young on modest wages and flogging them for big sums is quite attractive. There are many in this category in our current squad - Wright, Lawlor, Ben Khemis, Mason, May, Beestin, Garratt, Marquis etc. Striking looking at that Saunders team of “mesters” how few of them had any resale value or were the right side of 30. So whatever the results on the pitch I can see the attraction to the Board of Ferguson as a manager who fits neatly into the overall strategy for the club. It's certainly a better strategy than building a side of misters who when you leave the league don't have a prayer in the next level. A number of the young players we have will have careers above this level in my opinion
Don't you think that our fortunes turned and we finished safe this season, then next season finished well up the league, that some of our younger, better players would be off somewhere else for more money and bigger clubs ?
I suspect that while the “leave” camp is quite modest, there are very few after two years in the “this guy is doing a great job”. Most folk probably in the “don’t want the disruption and will give him benefit of the doubt for a bit longer”. I would pitch him below SOD, Penney and Saunders, and around same level as Dickov in recent years.
Quote from: Chris Black come back on October 03, 2017, 10:04:25 amI suspect that while the “leave” camp is quite modest, there are very few after two years in the “this guy is doing a great job”. Most folk probably in the “don’t want the disruption and will give him benefit of the doubt for a bit longer”. I would pitch him below SOD, Penney and Saunders, and around same level as Dickov in recent years. I think he's done a good job, and may go on to do a great job.Saunders was a fly by night manager in how he set us up and in that he flew into the flames like a star struck moth. He could have done better but didn't, definitely worse than Fergie.Penney did great but ran out of steam at this level.SOD I liked and he ran well with the investment, would he have done well without that?Dickov was just too basic in the end.I honestly think Fergie could be one of our greatest ever managers *if* he can keep morale up and get through this patch and go forward from here.
Quote from: drfchound on October 03, 2017, 04:21:21 pmDon't you think that our fortunes turned and we finished safe this season, then next season finished well up the league, that some of our younger, better players would be off somewhere else for more money and bigger clubs ?That’s the whole point but it’s eluding plenty on here.
Quote from: Bristol Red Rover on October 03, 2017, 05:42:22 pmQuote from: Chris Black come back on October 03, 2017, 10:04:25 amI suspect that while the “leave” camp is quite modest, there are very few after two years in the “this guy is doing a great job”. Most folk probably in the “don’t want the disruption and will give him benefit of the doubt for a bit longer”. I would pitch him below SOD, Penney and Saunders, and around same level as Dickov in recent years. I think he's done a good job, and may go on to do a great job.Saunders was a fly by night manager in how he set us up and in that he flew into the flames like a star struck moth. He could have done better but didn't, definitely worse than Fergie.Penney did great but ran out of steam at this level.SOD I liked and he ran well with the investment, would he have done well without that?Dickov was just too basic in the end.I honestly think Fergie could be one of our greatest ever managers *if* he can keep morale up and get through this patch and go forward from here.How can you say "Saunders was definitely worse than Fergie?"
Quote from: DearneValleyRover on October 03, 2017, 06:41:16 pmQuote from: drfchound on October 03, 2017, 04:21:21 pmDon't you think that our fortunes turned and we finished safe this season, then next season finished well up the league, that some of our younger, better players would be off somewhere else for more money and bigger clubs ?That’s the whole point but it’s eluding plenty on here.I totally agree but there are some fans who envisage us keeping this current batch of young players and rising to become the mainstays of a sustainable Championship club.
I don't think we'd have won the league under him personally.
Amazes me how people go on about how good Saunders was when in actual fact he got us relegated out the league we were in and then got us promoted out the league below. Identical to fergie, yet the same people slag one off and worship the other
Yes you're right mate,So he didn't even get us promoted out the league below,Fergie got us relegated then got us promoted with ease yet he doesn't have a clue but Saunders is the messiah
Quote from: dickos1 on October 03, 2017, 08:27:34 pmYes you're right mate,So he didn't even get us promoted out the league below,Fergie got us relegated then got us promoted with ease yet he doesn't have a clue but Saunders is the messiahWho is saying Saunders was the messiah?
Because he doesn't have the team running through brick walls, and he's never since he's been here looked anything like getting us promoted out of this league.Saunders may have got us relegated but we'd taken something daft like 1 point from the opening 6 games so we were already off to a shitter, and he also had the experiment to contend with. And until a late collapse we were a reasonable shout to survive.[/quoteSimilar to ferguson then, taking over a side in the relegation zone and getting relegated, and then doing well in the league below. Saunders then got relegated with wolves and did a shocking job with chesterfield