0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
...for party politicking. But it is perfectly reasonable to.list questions that will need to be addressed afterwards.The Public Health England planning document on infectious disease planning strategy for 2020-2025 was published in September last year.https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/phe-infectious-diseases-strategy&ved=2ahUKEwjY2qiUupzoAhWXEMAKHQD7DfgQFjABegQIBhAC&usg=AOvVaw3zyIUepp5z2AaKGJ2H4GGpOn page 13 of that document, Influenza-type pandemic is identified as "the highest scoring risk on the National Risk Register of Civil Emergencies"The Health Secretary has been on the BBC today, admitting that we do not have anywhere near enough respirators for the people who are going to need them. And respirators are vital in saving lives. He's urged a "wartime effort" from everyone from car manufacturers to bomb makers to change their production lines to make respirators.Which raises 2 questions. 1) Why was this shortfall not addressed months and years ago?2) Why the hell was it not dealt with as an emergency 4 weeks ago, when the very real threat of this going epidemic was clear?
Bob, they bare bothered one iota how long you wait to get into the States, just if you should be there, and in this case whether you are fit enough to be there. How long it takes is irrelevant.
Billy, how the States look after themselves has nothing to do with us at all, although if a queue in a US airport upsets you so you can have a pop at their government so be it, if that gives you a lift well done. If the Democrats were in power, no doubt you would be holding them up as saints, and comparing it with our lax entry programme run by Boris and holding their draconian system as the way we should be acting, instead of people breezing into this country without checks and still getting criticism. In this country we have tested 40, 274 people, no doubt the people who thought they had the symptoms of the virus, 1372 a rise in a day from yesterdays figure of 232 have tested positive, with 35 deaths a just over 2.5% death rate of positive patients tested, and 0.0869% of the total people tested not great figures with 3.406% of those tested being found to have the virus. Just as a side discussion, do France, Italy, Germany etc. have like us a Flu jab and pneumonia jab programme like we do on the national health free, people keep saying we are a fortnight behind Italy etc, are we really?or could our immunisation programme free of charge for older people be a reason for slightly different results, not a pop a genuine question.
The "rate of infection" is the percentage of the population that have or have had the virus.The slope of the graph is the "rate of increase in the rate of infection".Those graphs show that our reported case rate of increase is following broadly the same trend that Italy's was 2 weeks ago.We are on the same track as Italy. We're not currently in the same place. But we are going there rapidly.Sorry if I sounded hectoring. It's just important to be clear on this.
Big H.Agreed on the vaccine. Anyone who has been vaccinated against usual flu will get zero benefit against C-19. It's a different virus.Unfortunately, your assessment on the number of cases (better than most as it is) is almost certainly a huge underestimate. That's because the people dying today didn't catch the disease today. They caught it probably 5-14 days ago. So if there's a 1% death rate, it means we had 3,500 cases 1-2 weeks ago. And ulif the number of cases are doubling every 5 days as the epidemiologists think, we've currently got 10-25,000 cases.
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on March 15, 2020, 12:21:03 pm...for party politicking. But it is perfectly reasonable to.list questions that will need to be addressed afterwards.The Public Health England planning document on infectious disease planning strategy for 2020-2025 was published in September last year.https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/phe-infectious-diseases-strategy&ved=2ahUKEwjY2qiUupzoAhWXEMAKHQD7DfgQFjABegQIBhAC&usg=AOvVaw3zyIUepp5z2AaKGJ2H4GGpOn page 13 of that document, Influenza-type pandemic is identified as "the highest scoring risk on the National Risk Register of Civil Emergencies"The Health Secretary has been on the BBC today, admitting that we do not have anywhere near enough respirators for the people who are going to need them. And respirators are vital in saving lives. He's urged a "wartime effort" from everyone from car manufacturers to bomb makers to change their production lines to make respirators.Which raises 2 questions. 1) Why was this shortfall not addressed months and years ago?2) Why the hell was it not dealt with as an emergency 4 weeks ago, when the very real threat of this going epidemic was clear?I wonder whether the Australian public are lambasting their government who haven’t got enough Covid19 testing kits.
Well Syd, it looks like your wish for the oldies to pop off could be about to come back and bite people like you in the arse buddy.