0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Not sure if anybodies seen this, but again we come out of this very well.In League 1 we spent £62k which puts us at 16th. Not bad for a 9th spot finish, and shows that keeping cash in the club, especially at times like this really works, and its another example of trying to do things the right way.Look at Sunderland though, £1.346m.Peterborough on £186k and Bristol Rovers £141k etc etc.
Quote from: silent majority on June 25, 2020, 04:51:09 pmNot sure if anybodies seen this, but again we come out of this very well.In League 1 we spent £62k which puts us at 16th. Not bad for a 9th spot finish, and shows that keeping cash in the club, especially at times like this really works, and its another example of trying to do things the right way.Look at Sunderland though, £1.346m.Peterborough on £186k and Bristol Rovers £141k etc etc.Not seen this so thank you for sharing.Whilst we seem to be giving out grammar lessons today, can I just point out that “not sure if anybodies seen this” should be “not sure if anybody has seen this”.
Quote from: NewDonny on June 25, 2020, 05:20:10 pmQuote from: silent majority on June 25, 2020, 04:51:09 pmNot sure if anybodies seen this, but again we come out of this very well.In League 1 we spent £62k which puts us at 16th. Not bad for a 9th spot finish, and shows that keeping cash in the club, especially at times like this really works, and its another example of trying to do things the right way.Look at Sunderland though, £1.346m.Peterborough on £186k and Bristol Rovers £141k etc etc.Not seen this so thank you for sharing.Whilst we seem to be giving out grammar lessons today, can I just point out that “not sure if anybodies seen this” should be “not sure if anybody has seen this”.If you’re asking a question (can I just point out?) shouldn’t that end with a question mark? Interesting numbers but it would be good to see it lined up with transfer fees/players signed as the absolute figure itself doesn’t necessarily tell the whole story. For example Bristol Rovers spent over twice as much as we did, but if they signed twice as many players then it’s not unreasonable.
Quote from: silent majority on June 25, 2020, 04:51:09 pmNot sure if anybodies seen this, but again we come out of this very well.In League 1 we spent £62k which puts us at 16th. Not bad for a 9th spot finish, and shows that keeping cash in the club, especially at times like this really works, and its another example of trying to do things the right way.Look at Sunderland though, £1.346m.Peterborough on £186k and Bristol Rovers £141k etc etc.Not seen this so thank you for sharing.Whilst we seem to be giving out grammar lessons today, can I just point out that “not sure imf anybodies seen this” should be “not sure if anybody has seen this”.
I have to ask the question out of our squad who would have needed an agent to sign for us?Cole? Fej?Do loans for players involve agents?Players who signed an extended contract?
Quote from: ravenrover on June 25, 2020, 09:19:50 pmI have to ask the question out of our squad who would have needed an agent to sign for us?Cole? Fej?Do loans for players involve agents?Players who signed an extended contract?Every single player has an agent, long gone are the days of players sorting out their contracts and everything themselves.
I’d like to see how much we’ve spent on loan fees and developing/paying players there are not ours and can get no return on. What about letting a saleable assets contract run down do he leaves for nothing. To imply our owners/ CEO are fiscally astute is nonsense.
Quote from: GazLaz on June 26, 2020, 09:25:27 amI’d like to see how much we’ve spent on loan fees and developing/paying players there are not ours and can get no return on. What about letting a saleable assets contract run down do he leaves for nothing. To imply our owners/ CEO are fiscally astute is nonsense. So you're asking a question to which you don't know the answer and based on that, you come to the conclusion that the board/CEO cannot be fiscally astute?You say 'letting' saleable assets run their contracts down. Have you actually thought that through?
Quote from: RoversAlias on June 25, 2020, 09:25:28 pmQuote from: ravenrover on June 25, 2020, 09:19:50 pmI have to ask the question out of our squad who would have needed an agent to sign for us?Cole? Fej?Do loans for players involve agents?Players who signed an extended contract?Every single player has an agent, long gone are the days of players sorting out their contracts and everything themselves.Agents are the biggest problem in football. It seems that as soon as a kid joins a club the first thing they do is get an agent. They cannot wipe their own noses without help from their agent. I wouldn't be surprised if they had to ask their agent where they should go on holiday.
Quote from: DonnyBazR0ver on June 26, 2020, 10:47:02 amQuote from: GazLaz on June 26, 2020, 09:25:27 amI’d like to see how much we’ve spent on loan fees and developing/paying players there are not ours and can get no return on. What about letting a saleable assets contract run down do he leaves for nothing. To imply our owners/ CEO are fiscally astute is nonsense. So you're asking a question to which you don't know the answer and based on that, you come to the conclusion that the board/CEO cannot be fiscally astute?You say 'letting' saleable assets run their contracts down. Have you actually thought that through? Quote from: GazLaz on June 26, 2020, 09:25:27 amI’d like to see how much we’ve spent on loan fees and developing/paying players there are not ours and can get no return on. What about letting a saleable assets contract run down do he leaves for nothing. To imply our owners/ CEO are fiscally astute is nonsense. Gaz, you obviously don't know how the modern loan system works, so basing your conclusion on something you don't understand is a bit fruitless really.
Quote from: silent majority on June 26, 2020, 11:56:10 amQuote from: DonnyBazR0ver on June 26, 2020, 10:47:02 amQuote from: GazLaz on June 26, 2020, 09:25:27 amI’d like to see how much we’ve spent on loan fees and developing/paying players there are not ours and can get no return on. What about letting a saleable assets contract run down do he leaves for nothing. To imply our owners/ CEO are fiscally astute is nonsense. So you're asking a question to which you don't know the answer and based on that, you come to the conclusion that the board/CEO cannot be fiscally astute?You say 'letting' saleable assets run their contracts down. Have you actually thought that through? Quote from: GazLaz on June 26, 2020, 09:25:27 amI’d like to see how much we’ve spent on loan fees and developing/paying players there are not ours and can get no return on. What about letting a saleable assets contract run down do he leaves for nothing. To imply our owners/ CEO are fiscally astute is nonsense. Gaz, you obviously don't know how the modern loan system works, so basing your conclusion on something you don't understand is a bit fruitless really. So we have paid zero loan fees, wages and for developing other teams player’s over the last few years? If that’s the case I stand corrected. It’s not the case though is it.
£50million in fees in the Championship.There are, what? 700 players in that division? Say as many as 500 of them needed agent activity in a season (renegotiating contracts, negotiating deals with new clubs) That's £100,000 per deal.Not a bad line of work, is it?