Labour U Turns Part 164

[Nudga]

Maybe you should do politics,because you're totally wrong on that.


So they're voting in a different country for a cease fire in another country?

[BillyStubbsTears]

The whole issue in the Commons last night was dreadful.

All three main parties support very similar policies over Gaza.

The SNP could, if they were really interested in encouraging a united front (plot spoiler: they aren't...ever) have liaised with both the Tories and Labour to come up with an amendment that all sides could have supported.

They didn't. They deliberately crafted wording that was aimed at dividing Labour MPs.

Labour clearly put pressure on the Speaker, which is outrageous.

The Speaker folded, which is awful.

The Tories threw petrol on the flames by manoeuvring to stop the SNP amendment from being raised, which is playing games.

None of them come out of this with any credit. And the fact that all want a ceasefire is lost in the future, which is the worst thing of all.

[drfchound]

Don’t the SNP want to divide Labour to improve their own standing in Scotland.
Surely that would be at the forefront of their thinking.
That’s what politicians do all the time, if they occasionally agree it usually has an ulterior motive behind it.

[selby]

  Stabber Starmer at it again, more faces than a cut diamond, not to be trusted, and lying his head off on this subject and his complicity in the pressure on Hoyle.

[SydneyRover]

  Stabber Starmer at it again, more faces than a cut diamond, not to be trusted, and lying his head off on this subject and his complicity in the pressure on Hoyle.

And yet your support for brexit would suggest you voted for ........................ ta da johnson, no?

[scawsby steve]

  Stabber Starmer at it again, more faces than a cut diamond, not to be trusted, and lying his head off on this subject and his complicity in the pressure on Hoyle.

And yet your support for brexit would suggest you voted for ........................ ta da johnson, no?

What the almighty f*ck has that to do with this thread?

[Ldr]

  Stabber Starmer at it again, more faces than a cut diamond, not to be trusted, and lying his head off on this subject and his complicity in the pressure on Hoyle.

And yet your support for brexit would suggest you voted for ........................ ta da johnson, no?

What the almighty f*ck has that to do with this thread?

As usual f**k all, it’s like a kid needing attention posting now

[selby]

  I will accept anything you say about my comments Syd, but the way I voted or didn't vote in the general election is between me and the ballot box and nothing at all to do with you, and I will leave it to your absolutely fantastic imagination, lack of common sense and humility to others to guess.

[SydneyRover]

Only going on what your comments suggest selby, got a couple of snappers too though.

[Sprotyrover]

  Stabber Starmer at it again, more faces than a cut diamond, not to be trusted, and lying his head off on this subject and his complicity in the pressure on Hoyle.

And yet your support for brexit would suggest you voted for ........................ ta da johnson, no?

WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR SYD..WILLY THE WOMBAT?

[Bristol Red Rover]

The whole issue in the Commons last night was dreadful.

All three main parties support very similar policies over Gaza.

The SNP could, if they were really interested in encouraging a united front (plot spoiler: they aren't...ever) have liaised with both the Tories and Labour to come up with an amendment that all sides could have supported.

They didn't. They deliberately crafted wording that was aimed at dividing Labour MPs.

Labour clearly put pressure on the Speaker, which is outrageous.

The Speaker folded, which is awful.

The Tories threw petrol on the flames by manoeuvring to stop the SNP amendment from being raised, which is playing games.

None of them come out of this with any credit. And the fact that all want a ceasefire is lost in the future, which is the worst thing of all.

I agree the SNP would do almost anything to get at Labour. However,  the significant issue here is that they had a motion that condemmed Israeli genocide, "collective punishment". Labour also added "humanitarian" ceasefire. Put simply, this is Labour acting under the pressure of Israel.

[albie]

I see Keith has now been referred to the Standards Committee over his actions interfering with the speaker.

This is the investigative body which found Johnson out over partygate, leading to his resignation.
Be interesting to see how it plays out!

[Bentley Bullet]

What goes around comes around.

I suppose you could call it Starmer karma.

[drfchound]

He will categorically deny that he did anything wrong.

[selby]

  Everybody will know he is a lier though.

[SydneyRover]

Is it being dishonest when someone says they don't drink and then lets slip they're on the brandy watching the cricket,

hmmm

[drfchound]

Is it being dishonest when someone says they don't drink and then lets slip they're on the brandy watching the cricket,

hmmm

Is that as serious as a Party leader trying to influence the Speaker?
Aye.

[Bristol Red Rover]

I suspect its not him directly but other influential MPs who it's known, by Hoyle, have sway or are in the Starmer inner circle. Could be other party officials too, but either way I think Starmer will avoid direct implication on this occasion - amateurish if not..

[Bentley Bullet]

I suspect its not him directly but other influential MPs who it's known, by Hoyle, have sway or are in the Starmer inner circle. Could be other party officials too, but either way I think Starmer will avoid direct implication on this occasion - amateurish if not..

Of course, he will, why change the habit of a lifetime? If he wasn't such a hypocrite though, he should take responsibility because he's the Labour leader.....

..... But then again, why change the habit of a lifetime?

[SydneyRover]

Is it being dishonest when someone says they don't drink and then lets slip they're on the brandy watching the cricket,

hmmm

Is that as serious as a Party leader trying to influence the Speaker?
Aye.

I wonder why anyone would almost break their wrists trying to delete an offensive posts that they claim was humorous, is that being dishonest I wonder?

[SydneyRover]

I guess it comes across as a bit lame if one cannot be honest with oneself but want honesty from others.

[drfchound]

Is it being dishonest when someone says they don't drink and then lets slip they're on the brandy watching the cricket,

hmmm

Is that as serious as a Party leader trying to influence the Speaker?
Aye.

I wonder why anyone would almost break their wrists trying to delete an offensive posts that they claim was humorous, is that being dishonest I wonder?

SR, I’m getting a bit fed up of you accusing me of deleting a post which you didn’t like.
Just to clear this up, what did the post say?  Come on, tell me.

[SydneyRover]

You know where I said my brother came back from sellafield with more that he left with

and you said that may be down to sellafield sue

surely you must remember such a crass remark hound

[ravenrover]

Has Tory Chief Whip also been reported to the same committee as Starmer for the same reason?

[drfchound]

You know where I said my brother came back from sellafield with more that he left with

and you said that may be down to sellafield sue

surely you must remember such a crass remark hound

I do remember it, yes.
But for you to say I deleted it just another of your lies.
I had no reason to think it was a crass remark and still think it was just a man type funny comment that mates throw around when they are having a laugh.
I suppose there is a reason why you wouldn’t understand that.
To confirm that I didn’t delete the post, see below:

637
Off Topic / Re: Electric cars and the environment (warning cheat sheet)
« on: December 05, 2023, 08:01:59 pm »
Quote from: SydneyRover on December 05, 2023, 11:32:16 am
But you don't want to work or live near a nuclear plant? It's safe for someone else to take the risk.

My brother worked at Sellafield for about a year and came home with more than he went with.

[quote from DRFC hound]
That might have been down to Sellafield Sue.

[SydneyRover]

You know where I said my brother came back from sellafield with more that he left with

and you said that may be down to sellafield sue

surely you must remember such a crass remark hound

Can I get the keys to jcb hound

I do remember it, yes.
But for you to say I deleted it just another of your lies.
I had no reason to think it was a crass remark and still think it was just a man type funny comment that mates throw around when they are having a laugh.
I suppose there is a reason why you wouldn’t understand that.
To confirm that I didn’t delete the post, see below:

637
Off Topic / Re: Electric cars and the environment (warning cheat sheet)
« on: December 05, 2023, 08:01:59 pm »
Quote from: SydneyRover on December 05, 2023, 11:32:16 am
But you don't want to work or live near a nuclear plant? It's safe for someone else to take the risk.

My brother worked at Sellafield for about a year and came home with more than he went with.

[quote from DRFC hound]
That might have been down to Sellafield Sue.

[drfchound]

Can you write that in the right place and then admit you were lying about me deleting my post.

[drfchound]

You know where I said my brother came back from sellafield with more that he left with

and you said that may be down to sellafield sue

surely you must remember such a crass remark hound

Can I get the keys to jcb hound

I do remember it, yes.
But for you to say I deleted it just another of your lies.
I had no reason to think it was a crass remark and still think it was just a man type funny comment that mates throw around when they are having a laugh.
I suppose there is a reason why you wouldn’t understand that.
To confirm that I didn’t delete the post, see below:

637
Off Topic / Re: Electric cars and the environment (warning cheat sheet)
« on: December 05, 2023, 08:01:59 pm »
Quote from: SydneyRover on December 05, 2023, 11:32:16 am
But you don't want to work or live near a nuclear plant? It's safe for someone else to take the risk.

My brother worked at Sellafield for about a year and came home with more than he went with.

[quote from DRFC hound]
That might have been down to Sellafield Sue.

The bit in red is in the wrong place SR.
Can you now admit you were lying about me deleting my post.

[SydneyRover]

Can you write that in the right place and then admit you were lying about me deleting my post.

Riddle me this hound your name is at the top of the screenshot, therefore the only person that could delete the post is you, unless you can show where it is of course

[drfchound]

Can you write that in the right place and then admit you were lying about me deleting my post.

Riddle me this hound your name is at the top of the screenshot, therefore the only person that could delete the post is you, unless you can show where it is of course

Kinell Syd, I’ve just copied it from my past posts (back catalogue in your world).
December 5th 2023, page 22 of my recent posts.
It IS NOT deleted.
In your own time, followed by an apology.