Farage

[tommy toes]

BB
I don’t say my word is the truth.I give my opinion, now and then.
Others are free to disagree.
You believe your words are the truth and can’t stand it that people really don’t see things your way.
Hence your feud with BST (which you are losing badly btw)

TT.
Thanks for that. At last, a Labour supporter who admits that his own opinion is not necessarily the truth, rather than accusing anyone who disagrees with him of being a lying, thick, stupid, racist fascist bas**rd.

Right so when are you going to realise that your opinions aren’t The Truth

[BillyStubbsTears]

If hospitals had 24/7 operations running where would the patients go after surgery? There is a chronic shortage of beds in all hospitals. At Bradford Royal Infirmary it takes hours to get a bed allocated after being referred and I imagine it is the same at most other hospitals. My wife was a nurse for 25 years and some days spent hours ringing round the wards trying to arrange beds for patients.

I think the conversation was more about 24 hour round the clock outpatient appointments idler, rather than around the clock surgery.

Cheers hound, I see what you mean. It would still accelerate patients towards surgery meaning moving the blockage further forward. Theatre and bed availability will still dictate operations being performed. Not an easy problem to solve.

It isn’t is it.
My wife has been waiting a long time to see a specialist.

I was referred by my GP for minor surgery to my nether regions in March last year.
Finally got a date July 12th.

Similar experience to mine, except mine isn't a minor issue.

[idler]

If hospitals had 24/7 operations running where would the patients go after surgery? There is a chronic shortage of beds in all hospitals. At Bradford Royal Infirmary it takes hours to get a bed allocated after being referred and I imagine it is the same at most other hospitals. My wife was a nurse for 25 years and some days spent hours ringing round the wards trying to arrange beds for patients.

I think the conversation was more about 24 hour round the clock outpatient appointments idler, rather than around the clock surgery.

Cheers hound, I see what you mean. It would still accelerate patients towards surgery meaning moving the blockage further forward. Theatre and bed availability will still dictate operations being performed. Not an easy problem to solve.

It isn’t is it.
My wife has been waiting a long time to see a specialist.

I went on a list about a spine problem over three years ago. I’m still on the list for Jimmy’s in Leeds.

[danumdon]

If hospitals had 24/7 operations running where would the patients go after surgery? There is a chronic shortage of beds in all hospitals. At Bradford Royal Infirmary it takes hours to get a bed allocated after being referred and I imagine it is the same at most other hospitals. My wife was a nurse for 25 years and some days spent hours ringing round the wards trying to arrange beds for patients.

I think the conversation was more about 24 hour round the clock outpatient appointments idler, rather than around the clock surgery.

Cheers hound, I see what you mean. It would still accelerate patients towards surgery meaning moving the blockage further forward. Theatre and bed availability will still dictate operations being performed. Not an easy problem to solve.

It isn’t is it.
My wife has been waiting a long time to see a specialist.

I was referred by my GP for minor surgery to my nether regions in March last year.
Finally got a date July 12th.

Similar experience to mine, except mine isn't a minor issue.

If you've been waiting over a year and its not a minor issue would you consider going private?

[BillyStubbsTears]

Oh this is a gem.

RefUK have dropped the candidates who said migrants should be slaughtered and that black people should stop acting like savages.

But tonight they've said that voters should still vote for them if they want to register their support for RefUK.

That's how you do it.

Horrified hands up saying "We are disgusted by this!" when Farage is faced with it live on TV.

Then a whisper to their voters "But we DO agree with it and we know you do too."

[BillyStubbsTears]

If hospitals had 24/7 operations running where would the patients go after surgery? There is a chronic shortage of beds in all hospitals. At Bradford Royal Infirmary it takes hours to get a bed allocated after being referred and I imagine it is the same at most other hospitals. My wife was a nurse for 25 years and some days spent hours ringing round the wards trying to arrange beds for patients.

I think the conversation was more about 24 hour round the clock outpatient appointments idler, rather than around the clock surgery.

Cheers hound, I see what you mean. It would still accelerate patients towards surgery meaning moving the blockage further forward. Theatre and bed availability will still dictate operations being performed. Not an easy problem to solve.

It isn’t is it.
My wife has been waiting a long time to see a specialist.

I was referred by my GP for minor surgery to my nether regions in March last year.
Finally got a date July 12th.

Similar experience to mine, except mine isn't a minor issue.

If you've been waiting over a year and its not a minor issue would you consider going private?

.
Frankly it's none of your business, but I didn't know how serious it was until I finally saw the consultant. The GP said nothing to me but clearly knew what the issue was given who she referred me to.

[Bentley Bullet]

BB
I don’t say my word is the truth.I give my opinion, now and then.
Others are free to disagree.
You believe your words are the truth and can’t stand it that people really don’t see things your way.
Hence your feud with BST (which you are losing badly btw)

TT.
Thanks for that. At last, a Labour supporter who admits that his own opinion is not necessarily the truth, rather than accusing anyone who disagrees with him of being a lying, thick, stupid, racist fascist bas**rd.

Right so when are you going to realise that your opinions aren’t The Truth

My opinions are based on what I believe to be the truth. For instance, I don't dislike Keir Starmer because he is Labour, I dislike him because he is disloyal, dishonest and inept, and his proposals are vague.

Your opinions, on the other hand, are based on one-sided bias. For instance, your opinion that I am 'losing my feud with BST badly' might mean something if it hadn't come from someone who probably thinks Sunak lost badly to Starmer in the TV debates.

[tommy toes]

If hospitals had 24/7 operations running where would the patients go after surgery? There is a chronic shortage of beds in all hospitals. At Bradford Royal Infirmary it takes hours to get a bed allocated after being referred and I imagine it is the same at most other hospitals. My wife was a nurse for 25 years and some days spent hours ringing round the wards trying to arrange beds for patients.

I think the conversation was more about 24 hour round the clock outpatient appointments idler, rather than around the clock surgery.

Cheers hound, I see what you mean. It would still accelerate patients towards surgery meaning moving the blockage further forward. Theatre and bed availability will still dictate operations being performed. Not an easy problem to solve.

It isn’t is it.
My wife has been waiting a long time to see a specialist.

I was referred by my GP for minor surgery to my nether regions in March last year.
Finally got a date July 12th.

Similar experience to mine, except mine isn't a minor issue.

Oh dear. I hope you get it sorted soon BST.

I’m hoping/expecting mine to be minor but the surgeon said they can’t be certain until they’ve got in there.

[danumdon]

If hospitals had 24/7 operations running where would the patients go after surgery? There is a chronic shortage of beds in all hospitals. At Bradford Royal Infirmary it takes hours to get a bed allocated after being referred and I imagine it is the same at most other hospitals. My wife was a nurse for 25 years and some days spent hours ringing round the wards trying to arrange beds for patients.

I think the conversation was more about 24 hour round the clock outpatient appointments idler, rather than around the clock surgery.

Cheers hound, I see what you mean. It would still accelerate patients towards surgery meaning moving the blockage further forward. Theatre and bed availability will still dictate operations being performed. Not an easy problem to solve.

It isn’t is it.
My wife has been waiting a long time to see a specialist.

I was referred by my GP for minor surgery to my nether regions in March last year.
Finally got a date July 12th.

Similar experience to mine, except mine isn't a minor issue.

If you've been waiting over a year and its not a minor issue would you consider going private?

.
Frankly it's none of your business, but I didn't know how serious it was until I finally saw the consultant. The GP said nothing to me but clearly knew what the issue was given who she referred me to.

Charming!

Im not actually bothered in your business, whatever you have is your issue and for you to deal with.

I only asked the question as an aside to your illustrious leader who would rather him or his family drop dead before he considers going private.

Just wanted to see if you were as stupid and as stubborn as him.

I know if i had a serious issue i'd rather pay than suffer the consequence's.

[BillyStubbsTears]

Oh this is a gem.

RefUK have dropped the candidates who said migrants should be slaughtered and that black people should stop acting like savages.

But tonight they've said that voters should still vote for them if they want to register their support for RefUK.

That's how you do it.

Horrified hands up saying "We are disgusted by this!" when Farage is faced with it live on TV.

Then a whisper to their voters "But we DO agree with it and we know you do too."

Come on then. Let's have you.

Those of you who insist most politicians are lying hypocrites while Farage is an honest straight talker.

Let's have your opinions on this.

Farage says he wants nothing to do with these candidates.

Then a spokesman for his party limited company says this, as reported by the BBC.

Asked what Reform would say to voters in the constituencies where the candidates had been dropped, the party spokesman said he would “encourage them to vote for the party, by voting for these people on the ballot paper".

This way, he said people could still vote for Reform's "policy platform".

He added: "I’m not saying the situation is ideal, but the size of the Reform vote share nationally is what matters."

Vote for them if you want, but get off your high f**king horses and accept you're voting for the biggest con man and liar in politics.

[tommy toes]

BB
I don’t say my word is the truth.I give my opinion, now and then.
Others are free to disagree.
You believe your words are the truth and can’t stand it that people really don’t see things your way.
Hence your feud with BST (which you are losing badly btw)

TT.
Thanks for that. At last, a Labour supporter who admits that his own opinion is not necessarily the truth, rather than accusing anyone who disagrees with him of being a lying, thick, stupid, racist fascist bas**rd.

Right so when are you going to realise that your opinions aren’t The Truth

My opinions are based on what I believe to be the truth. For instance, I don't dislike Keir Starmer because he is Labour, I dislike him because he is disloyal, dishonest and inept, and his proposals are vague.

Your opinions, on the other hand, are based on one-sided bias. For instance, your opinion that I am 'losing my feud with BST badly' might mean something if it hadn't come from someone who probably thinks Sunak lost badly to Starmer in the TV debates.

Your opinions of Starmer are not the truth, they are your opinions. Do you have the same opinions about Boris Johnson?
I think not, you’ve certainly never voiced them on here.
I didn’t think Starmer won the debate. Nor did Sunak. It was a mess.
I also don’t think the BBC is biased either way.
(Well apart from Kuennsberg)

[BillyStubbsTears]

If hospitals had 24/7 operations running where would the patients go after surgery? There is a chronic shortage of beds in all hospitals. At Bradford Royal Infirmary it takes hours to get a bed allocated after being referred and I imagine it is the same at most other hospitals. My wife was a nurse for 25 years and some days spent hours ringing round the wards trying to arrange beds for patients.

I think the conversation was more about 24 hour round the clock outpatient appointments idler, rather than around the clock surgery.

Cheers hound, I see what you mean. It would still accelerate patients towards surgery meaning moving the blockage further forward. Theatre and bed availability will still dictate operations being performed. Not an easy problem to solve.

It isn’t is it.
My wife has been waiting a long time to see a specialist.

I was referred by my GP for minor surgery to my nether regions in March last year.
Finally got a date July 12th.

Similar experience to mine, except mine isn't a minor issue.

If you've been waiting over a year and its not a minor issue would you consider going private?

.
Frankly it's none of your business, but I didn't know how serious it was until I finally saw the consultant. The GP said nothing to me but clearly knew what the issue was given who she referred me to.

Charming!

Im not actually bothered in your business, whatever you have is your issue and for you to deal with.

I only asked the question as an aside to your illustrious leader who would rather him or his family drop dead before he considers going private.

Just wanted to see if you were as stupid and as stubborn as him.

I know if i had a serious issue i'd rather pay than suffer the consequence's.

It's precisely because you've exhibited that attitude to any exchange we've had on here that I have no intention of discussing a life changing illness with you. And I have even less interest in your opinion of what you would do in a situation you clearly know f**k all about.

PS.

Go and have a think if, when reading about someone having a serious medical complaint, having an immediate response to goad them with a question to see if they are "stubborn and stupid" is what a normal person would do.

Then keep your f**king thoughts to yourself.

[Bentley Bullet]

Oh this is a gem.

RefUK have dropped the candidates who said migrants should be slaughtered and that black people should stop acting like savages.

But tonight they've said that voters should still vote for them if they want to register their support for RefUK.

That's how you do it.

Horrified hands up saying "We are disgusted by this!" when Farage is faced with it live on TV.

Then a whisper to their voters "But we DO agree with it and we know you do too."

Come on then. Let's have you.

Those of you who insist most politicians are lying hypocrites while Farage is an honest straight talker.

Let's have your opinions on this.

Farage says he wants nothing to do with these candidates.

Then a spokesman for his party limited company says this, as reported by the BBC.

Asked what Reform would say to voters in the constituencies where the candidates had been dropped, the party spokesman said he would “encourage them to vote for the party, by voting for these people on the ballot paper".

This way, he said people could still vote for Reform's "policy platform".

He added: "I’m not saying the situation is ideal, but the size of the Reform vote share nationally is what matters."

Vote for them if you want, but get off your high f**king horses and accept you're voting for the biggest con man and liar in politics.

BST should be far more concerned with the biggest conman and liar in politics who is about to become Prime Minister.

[SydneyRover]

BB
I don’t say my word is the truth.I give my opinion, now and then.
Others are free to disagree.
You believe your words are the truth and can’t stand it that people really don’t see things your way.
Hence your feud with BST (which you are losing badly btw)

TT.
Thanks for that. At last, a Labour supporter who admits that his own opinion is not necessarily the truth, rather than accusing anyone who disagrees with him of being a lying, thick, stupid, racist fascist bas**rd.

Right so when are you going to realise that your opinions aren’t The Truth

My opinions are based on what I believe to be the truth. For instance, I don't dislike Keir Starmer because he is Labour, I dislike him because he is disloyal, dishonest and inept, and his proposals are vague.

Your opinions, on the other hand, are based on one-sided bias. For instance, your opinion that I am 'losing my feud with BST badly' might mean something if it hadn't come from someone who probably thinks Sunak lost badly to Starmer in the TV debates.

It goes well beyond normal dislike bb, you readily accused Starmer of breaking the law during covid and failed to condemn those including johnson whom broke the law.

[danumdon]

If hospitals had 24/7 operations running where would the patients go after surgery? There is a chronic shortage of beds in all hospitals. At Bradford Royal Infirmary it takes hours to get a bed allocated after being referred and I imagine it is the same at most other hospitals. My wife was a nurse for 25 years and some days spent hours ringing round the wards trying to arrange beds for patients.

I think the conversation was more about 24 hour round the clock outpatient appointments idler, rather than around the clock surgery.

Cheers hound, I see what you mean. It would still accelerate patients towards surgery meaning moving the blockage further forward. Theatre and bed availability will still dictate operations being performed. Not an easy problem to solve.

It isn’t is it.
My wife has been waiting a long time to see a specialist.

I was referred by my GP for minor surgery to my nether regions in March last year.
Finally got a date July 12th.

Similar experience to mine, except mine isn't a minor issue.

If you've been waiting over a year and its not a minor issue would you consider going private?

.
Frankly it's none of your business, but I didn't know how serious it was until I finally saw the consultant. The GP said nothing to me but clearly knew what the issue was given who she referred me to.

Charming!

Im not actually bothered in your business, whatever you have is your issue and for you to deal with.

I only asked the question as an aside to your illustrious leader who would rather him or his family drop dead before he considers going private.

Just wanted to see if you were as stupid and as stubborn as him.

I know if i had a serious issue i'd rather pay than suffer the consequence's.

It's precisely because you've exhibited that attitude to any exchange we've had on here that I have no intention of discussing a life changing illness with you. And I have even less interest in your opinion of what you would do in a situation you clearly know f**k all about.

PS.

Go and have a think if, when reading about someone having a serious medical complaint, having an immediate response to goad them with a question to see if they are "stubborn and stupid" is what a normal person would do.

Then keep your f**king thoughts to yourself.

My initial quote only asked if you had considered going private.

My second reply was to you being Billy big b*llocks again.

You reap as you sow fella.

[tommy toes]

Ive ignored my own advice bygetting involved in a ‘debate’ with BB but his last post saying Starmer biggest liar ever in politics has brought me to my senses.
2 words BB
BORIS JOHNSON.
I’m out.

[Bentley Bullet]

BB
I don’t say my word is the truth.I give my opinion, now and then.
Others are free to disagree.
You believe your words are the truth and can’t stand it that people really don’t see things your way.
Hence your feud with BST (which you are losing badly btw)

TT.
Thanks for that. At last, a Labour supporter who admits that his own opinion is not necessarily the truth, rather than accusing anyone who disagrees with him of being a lying, thick, stupid, racist fascist bas**rd.

Right so when are you going to realise that your opinions aren’t The Truth

My opinions are based on what I believe to be the truth. For instance, I don't dislike Keir Starmer because he is Labour, I dislike him because he is disloyal, dishonest and inept, and his proposals are vague.

Your opinions, on the other hand, are based on one-sided bias. For instance, your opinion that I am 'losing my feud with BST badly' might mean something if it hadn't come from someone who probably thinks Sunak lost badly to Starmer in the TV debates.

Your opinions of Starmer are not the truth, they are your opinions. Do you have the same opinions about Boris Johnson?
I think not, you’ve certainly never voiced them on here.
I didn’t think Starmer won the debate. Nor did Sunak. It was a mess.
I also don’t think the BBC is biased either way.
(Well apart from Kuennsberg)

I believe my opinion of Starmer is the truth. He was disloyal to Jeremy Corbyn. He was dishonest in his manifesto to get himself voted as leader of the Labour Party. He is inept in his debating and looked like he was the man about to be replaced by Sunak, instead of the other way round, in the TV debates.

Boris Johnson's whole career was filled with lies. He was elected by people who knew exactly what he was, but his political intentions were obvious.

On the other hand, despite all his lies to get him where he is, Keir Starmer has never had his integrity questioned by you, and his intentions are vague, to put it mildly.

[SydneyRover]

Oh well bb you'll just have to suck it up aye, roll on Thursday

[danumdon]

BB
I don’t say my word is the truth.I give my opinion, now and then.
Others are free to disagree.
You believe your words are the truth and can’t stand it that people really don’t see things your way.
Hence your feud with BST (which you are losing badly btw)

TT.
Thanks for that. At last, a Labour supporter who admits that his own opinion is not necessarily the truth, rather than accusing anyone who disagrees with him of being a lying, thick, stupid, racist fascist bas**rd.

Right so when are you going to realise that your opinions aren’t The Truth

My opinions are based on what I believe to be the truth. For instance, I don't dislike Keir Starmer because he is Labour, I dislike him because he is disloyal, dishonest and inept, and his proposals are vague.

Your opinions, on the other hand, are based on one-sided bias. For instance, your opinion that I am 'losing my feud with BST badly' might mean something if it hadn't come from someone who probably thinks Sunak lost badly to Starmer in the TV debates.

Your opinions of Starmer are not the truth, they are your opinions. Do you have the same opinions about Boris Johnson?
I think not, you’ve certainly never voiced them on here.
I didn’t think Starmer won the debate. Nor did Sunak. It was a mess.
I also don’t think the BBC is biased either way.
(Well apart from Kuennsberg)

I believe my opinion of Starmer is the truth. He was disloyal to Jeremy Corbyn. He was dishonest in his manifesto to get himself voted as leader of the Labour Party. He is inept in his debating and looked like he was the man about to be replaced by Sunak, instead of the other way round, in the TV debates.

Boris Johnson's whole career was filled with lies. He was elected by people who knew exactly what he was, but his political intentions were obvious.

On the other hand, despite all his lies to get him where he is, Keir Starmer has never had his integrity questioned by you, and his intentions are vague, to put it mildly.

Its also the case that the way Starmer goes about his business is very much more dangerous than Johnson ever was, if Johnson's mouth was moving you knew he was lying, everyone knew that.

With Starmer it's much more nuanced, its done in a very sly and devious manner.

Far more dangerous than a buffoon like Johnson because in effect he's deceiving the electorate.

[SydneyRover]

Showing your ignorance once again dd, johnson was willing to break the law to get his way in parliament and in fact did break the law during covid.

[Bentley Bullet]

BB
I don’t say my word is the truth.I give my opinion, now and then.
Others are free to disagree.
You believe your words are the truth and can’t stand it that people really don’t see things your way.
Hence your feud with BST (which you are losing badly btw)

TT.
Thanks for that. At last, a Labour supporter who admits that his own opinion is not necessarily the truth, rather than accusing anyone who disagrees with him of being a lying, thick, stupid, racist fascist bas**rd.

Right so when are you going to realise that your opinions aren’t The Truth

My opinions are based on what I believe to be the truth. For instance, I don't dislike Keir Starmer because he is Labour, I dislike him because he is disloyal, dishonest and inept, and his proposals are vague.

Your opinions, on the other hand, are based on one-sided bias. For instance, your opinion that I am 'losing my feud with BST badly' might mean something if it hadn't come from someone who probably thinks Sunak lost badly to Starmer in the TV debates.

Your opinions of Starmer are not the truth, they are your opinions. Do you have the same opinions about Boris Johnson?
I think not, you’ve certainly never voiced them on here.
I didn’t think Starmer won the debate. Nor did Sunak. It was a mess.
I also don’t think the BBC is biased either way.
(Well apart from Kuennsberg)

I believe my opinion of Starmer is the truth. He was disloyal to Jeremy Corbyn. He was dishonest in his manifesto to get himself voted as leader of the Labour Party. He is inept in his debating and looked like he was the man about to be replaced by Sunak, instead of the other way round, in the TV debates.

Boris Johnson's whole career was filled with lies. He was elected by people who knew exactly what he was, but his political intentions were obvious.

On the other hand, despite all his lies to get him where he is, Keir Starmer has never had his integrity questioned by you, and his intentions are vague, to put it mildly.

Its also the case that the way Starmer goes about his business is very much more dangerous than Johnson ever was, if Johnson's mouth was moving you knew he was lying, everyone knew that.

With Starmer it's much more nuanced, its done in a very sly and devious manner.

Far more dangerous than a buffoon like Johnson because in effect he's deceiving the electorate.

Exf**kingzactly

[SydneyRover]

Showing your ignorance once again dd bb johnson was willing to break the law to get his way in parliament and in fact did break the law during covid.

[BillyStubbsTears]

If hospitals had 24/7 operations running where would the patients go after surgery? There is a chronic shortage of beds in all hospitals. At Bradford Royal Infirmary it takes hours to get a bed allocated after being referred and I imagine it is the same at most other hospitals. My wife was a nurse for 25 years and some days spent hours ringing round the wards trying to arrange beds for patients.

I think the conversation was more about 24 hour round the clock outpatient appointments idler, rather than around the clock surgery.

Cheers hound, I see what you mean. It would still accelerate patients towards surgery meaning moving the blockage further forward. Theatre and bed availability will still dictate operations being performed. Not an easy problem to solve.

It isn’t is it.
My wife has been waiting a long time to see a specialist.

I was referred by my GP for minor surgery to my nether regions in March last year.
Finally got a date July 12th.

Similar experience to mine, except mine isn't a minor issue.

If you've been waiting over a year and its not a minor issue would you consider going private?

.
Frankly it's none of your business, but I didn't know how serious it was until I finally saw the consultant. The GP said nothing to me but clearly knew what the issue was given who she referred me to.

Charming!

Im not actually bothered in your business, whatever you have is your issue and for you to deal with.

I only asked the question as an aside to your illustrious leader who would rather him or his family drop dead before he considers going private.

Just wanted to see if you were as stupid and as stubborn as him.

I know if i had a serious issue i'd rather pay than suffer the consequence's.

It's precisely because you've exhibited that attitude to any exchange we've had on here that I have no intention of discussing a life changing illness with you. And I have even less interest in your opinion of what you would do in a situation you clearly know f**k all about.

PS.

Go and have a think if, when reading about someone having a serious medical complaint, having an immediate response to goad them with a question to see if they are "stubborn and stupid" is what a normal person would do.

Then keep your f**king thoughts to yourself.

My initial quote only asked if you had considered going private.

My second reply was to you being Billy big b*llocks again.

You reap as you sow fella.

If you are going to be an unpleasant t**t, at least own it.

Your own words

"I only asked the question (NB: before I'd responded to you) as an aside to your illustrious leader who would rather him or his family drop dead before he considers going private.

Just wanted to see if you were as stupid and as stubborn as him."

You read me saying I have a serious medical issue and that's what your first thought is.

[danumdon]

If hospitals had 24/7 operations running where would the patients go after surgery? There is a chronic shortage of beds in all hospitals. At Bradford Royal Infirmary it takes hours to get a bed allocated after being referred and I imagine it is the same at most other hospitals. My wife was a nurse for 25 years and some days spent hours ringing round the wards trying to arrange beds for patients.

I think the conversation was more about 24 hour round the clock outpatient appointments idler, rather than around the clock surgery.

Cheers hound, I see what you mean. It would still accelerate patients towards surgery meaning moving the blockage further forward. Theatre and bed availability will still dictate operations being performed. Not an easy problem to solve.

It isn’t is it.
My wife has been waiting a long time to see a specialist.

I was referred by my GP for minor surgery to my nether regions in March last year.
Finally got a date July 12th.

Similar experience to mine, except mine isn't a minor issue.

If you've been waiting over a year and its not a minor issue would you consider going private?

.
Frankly it's none of your business, but I didn't know how serious it was until I finally saw the consultant. The GP said nothing to me but clearly knew what the issue was given who she referred me to.

Charming!

Im not actually bothered in your business, whatever you have is your issue and for you to deal with.

I only asked the question as an aside to your illustrious leader who would rather him or his family drop dead before he considers going private.

Just wanted to see if you were as stupid and as stubborn as him.

I know if i had a serious issue i'd rather pay than suffer the consequence's.

It's precisely because you've exhibited that attitude to any exchange we've had on here that I have no intention of discussing a life changing illness with you. And I have even less interest in your opinion of what you would do in a situation you clearly know f**k all about.

PS.

Go and have a think if, when reading about someone having a serious medical complaint, having an immediate response to goad them with a question to see if they are "stubborn and stupid" is what a normal person would do.

Then keep your f**king thoughts to yourself.

My initial quote only asked if you had considered going private.

My second reply was to you being Billy big b*llocks again.

You reap as you sow fella.

If you are going to be an unpleasant t**t, at least own it.

Your own words

"I only asked the question (NB: before I'd responded to you) as an aside to your illustrious leader who would rather him or his family drop dead before he considers going private.

Just wanted to see if you were as stupid and as stubborn as him."

You read me saying I have a serious medical issue and that's what your first thought is.

Jesus, are you still harping on.

I asked a perfectly innocent question, you, as usual jump in with both feet and basically told me to FO and mind my own business.

My reply matched your boorishness.

[selby]

  There you go again Billy, now you call me an idiot, that goes along in with Nazi, and bigot, not bad that I might have just gone up in the world, and must get right under your skin.
   I like people who think I am an idiot actually, there are a lot of things you can turn to your advantage when someone underestimates you, and I love you.

[ravenrover]

I can't disagree with you there, rr.

There are times I haven't got a clue of what I was saying:-))

[Herbert Anchovy]

Anyone see Farage interviewed on Sky this morning? He’s a very odd interviewee. He basically answers questions with the question that he’d rather be asked!!

[drfchound]

Anyone see Farage interviewed on Sky this morning? He’s a very odd interviewee. He basically answers questions with the question that he’d rather be asked!!

Come on mate, they all do that.

[DRFC_AjA]

Keep up the good fight folks. Don't let the white middle class liberals keep pushing you down and telling you you're stupid for talking about things that actually affect you as a working class person. Mass uncontrolled immigration isn't just more uber drivers for your middle class takeaway. Despite what Banksy and his trendy little Glastonbury "art" might mean. The silly sausage forgot the queue of white male homeless people in his "art" but I'm sure it was just an error

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=93SKRt0d5M0

[Bentley Bullet]

Now't wrong with Mass uncontrolled immigration. You can never have enough hairdresser shops.

It must be the fringe benefit handouts that are the incentive.