0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
I suggest you get your facts right before you start the pontificating. 18 negative posts about the player in question. Very few of which were started by me.The trouble with certain individuals on this forum is that they are holier than though and always right.If anyone has the temerity to say anything negative it gets exagerated. The positives are always forgotten.Where is the evidence then Bob G? Is it correct because you say so?I am certainly not the only one who doesn't rate the player in question have all the others read the evidence wrong as well?
, if you care to read my post none selectivelyCheersBobG
come on people...why do the selective bunch really dislike Wilson.He's not a flare player like others, he does his job nice n simple...pass and move, pass and move etc etc.He's doing a Wellens 'style' role and is filling the spot well
Never said you were the only one to dislike Wilson WellRed. The point that gets right up my nose, if you care to read my post none selectively, is your never ending stream of complaints, whinging, moaning and negative vibes.CheersBobG
BobG wrote:Quote, if you care to read my post none selectivelyCheersBobGMission imposable!
wow is that the best you can come up with after spitting your dummy out yesterday when you couldn't get your own way?Surely you can come up with something better than that. Two words and one of them spelt wrong!!! tut tut
Whatever.
If it makes you happy.
If you actually look back to the start of the post Rob the Rover made a comment about John Oster being his MOTM. I then replied to his post agreeing that I thought so too.If you are going to use that flimsy argument to say I changed the subject then frankly you are clutching at straws.
I saw one yesterday but if we are going down that road how many sloppy balls does Stocky give away in dangerous positions? and that isn't a criticism of Stock as he is for me probably our most influential player when fit.
I didn`t ask you about Stock, the debate is about Oster, you only choose to see the posative things about oster, likewise it`s the opposite with Wilson, you only see the negative things
So now you are changing the debate from Oster to Wilson to suit your purpose
Just like you changed the debate from Oster to Stock to suit your purpose
If it makes you happy
Remind me again who was the baby crying in the photo ;-)
Oh I thought the reason you had taken so long to reply was you was having the photo taken